Literature DB >> 28628450

Zika Virus Screening among Spanish Team Members After 2016 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Olympic Games.

Natalia Rodriguez-Valero, Alberto M Borobia, Mar Lago, Maria Paz Sánchez-Seco, Fernando de Ory, Ana Vázquez, Jose Luis Pérez-Arellano, Cristina Carranza Rodríguez, Miguel J Martínez, Alicia Capón, Elias Cañas, Joaquin Salas-Coronas, Arkaitz Azcune Galparsoro, Jose Muñoz.   

Abstract

We evaluated the risk for the Spanish Olympic Team acquiring Zika virus in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, during 2016. We recruited 117 team members, and all tested negative for Zika virus. Lack of cases in this cohort supports the minimum risk estimates made before the Games.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brazil; Olympic Games; Olympic team; Rio de Janeiro; Spain; Zika virus; arboviruses; mass gathering event; screening; vector-borne infections; viruses

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28628450      PMCID: PMC5547782          DOI: 10.3201/eid2308.170415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


The current Zika virus epidemic became a major concern for national Olympic delegations before they traveled to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, during summer 2016. Fear about individual consequences of the infection, such as congenital or neurologic disorders, were common among athletes and other participants of the Olympic Games and led some persons not to attend the Games for these reasons. The possibility of the Olympics contributing to a global spread of the Zika virus epidemic also was a concern, initially raised by ≈100 academic researchers, expressed in an open letter addressed to the World Health Organization (WHO) in May 2016 (,). The risk for Zika during the Rio de Janeiro Olympic Games was estimated to be very low in different models published in medical journals (9 × 10−6 to 3 × 10−5) (–). After considering these figures, WHO advised that the Games should not substantially affect the epidemic (). To evaluate the risk for the Spanish Olympic Team acquiring Zika virus, our research group from 6 hospitals in Spain invited members of the Spanish delegation to participate in a serologic study of Zika virus 20 and 30 days after returning from Rio de Janeiro. The study was conducted in 6 different recruiting Tropical Medicine Units in cities in Spain (Barcelona, Madrid, Sevilla, San Sebastian, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, and Almeria). Athletes and other participants were invited to participate in the study through the Spanish Olympic Committee. A total of 117 Olympics participants accepted and were included in the study during September and October 2016. After providing oral and written information, study participants signed an informed consent form, and demographic and health data were recorded in a medical questionnaire. A total of 10 mL of blood was drawn from each participant, and serologic tests for Zika virus (immunofluorescence antibody assay; EUROIMMUN, Luebeck, Germany), dengue virus (ELISA; Panbio, Kyonggi-do, Republic of Korea), and chikungunya virus (immunofluorescence assay; EUROIMMUN) were conducted at the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Spanish National Reference Laboratory, Madrid, Spain). For all samples initially testing positive for Zika virus, we conducted microneutralization testing. Twenty-one participants had >1 signs or symptoms while in Brazil: 18% rash, 23% fever (temperature >38°C), 14% itching, 9% of conjunctival hyperemia, 9% arthralgia, 14% myalgia, 40% malaise, 9% lymphadenopathy, 32% headache, and 19% gastrointestinal symptoms. Ninety-nine percent of participants received Zika virus counseling before they traveled to Rio de Janeiro, including the advice of having protected sex during and after the Games (Table).
Table

Demographic and travel-related characteristics of 117 Spanish athletes who attended the Olympic Games, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2016*

CharacteristicResults
Sex
M76 (65.0)
F
41 (35.0)
Age, y, median ± SD
35.54 ± 9.46
Athletes
All athletes53 (45.3)
Outdoor athletes
35 (66.0)
Spanish nationality
112 (95.7)
Chronic disease6 (5.1)
Immunosuppression
0
Current pregnancy, own or partner’s
9 (7.7)†
Intention to conceive within the following 6 mo29 (24.8)
Sex
M 22 (75.9)
F
7 (24.1)
Vaccination and travel advice
Vaccine
Yellow fever23 (19.6)
Japanese encephalitis0
Tickborne encephalitis0
Attendance at a travel clinic115 (98.3)
Zika advice included
116 (99.2)
>1 Visit to a tropical country
74 (63.3)
Previous diagnosis of dengue
0
During the trip
Length of stay, d, median ± SD21.35 ± 9.05
Places visited
Rio de Janeiro103 (88)
Rio de Janeiro, Deodoro, and Barra7 (6.0)
Rio de Janeiro and Ilha Grande4 (3.4)
Rio de Janeiro and Paraty1 (0.85)
Rio de Janeiro and French Polynesia
1 (0.85)
Use of bed nets or air conditioners61 (52.6)
Use of repellent111 (94.9)
Risky sexual behavior2 (1.7)
Recall >1 mosquito bite during stay56 (47.9)

*All values are no. (%) unless otherwise indicated.
†Male participants’ partners who were pregnant before the Games.

*All values are no. (%) unless otherwise indicated.
†Male participants’ partners who were pregnant before the Games. For 4 persons, test results for Zika virus IgG was positive; IgM and neutralization testing yielded negative results. The 4 Zika virus IgG–positive participants had received previous yellow fever vaccination and were asymptomatic. One sample showed Zika virus IgM in the absence of specific IgG; the results were confirmed in a follow-up sample. Thus, the sample was classified as false positive. Study participants were advised to wait to conceive in accordance with WHO specifications: 6 months for men, 2 months for women. Participants with pregnant partners were advised to use condoms during the entire pregnancy. A lack of Zika cases in this cohort supports the risk calculations made before the Games and the WHO statement that there were no Zika cases associated with the Olympic Games (). Although 48% of participants in our study recalled at least 1 mosquito bite during the stay, the overall absence of cases in the Rio de Janeiro population during July and August 2016 (,) is believed to be due to the vector-control efforts by Brazilian authorities before the Games and to the winter weather, leading to a low presence of adult mosquitoes and mosquito bites (,).
  4 in total

1.  Projected Zika Virus Importation and Subsequent Ongoing Transmission after Travel to the 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games - Country-Specific Assessment, July 2016.

Authors:  Ardath Grills; Stephanie Morrison; Bradley Nelson; Jennifer Miniota; Alexander Watts; Martin S Cetron
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  Zika is not a reason for missing the Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro: response to the open letter of Dr Attaran and colleagues to Dr Margaret Chan, Director - General, WHO, on the Zika threat to the Olympic and Paralympic Games.

Authors:  Claudia Codeço; Daniel Villela; Marcelo F Gomes; Leonardo Bastos; Oswaldo Cruz; Claudio Struchiner; Luis Max Carvalho; Flavio Coelho
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.743

3.  What is the experience from previous mass gathering events? Lessons for Zika virus and the Olympics 2016.

Authors:  A Zumla; B McCloskey; A A Bin Saeed; O Dar; B Al Otabi; S Perlmann; P Gautret; N Roy; L Blumberg; E I Azhar; M Barbeschi; Z Memish; E Petersen
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Estimated Zika virus importations to Europe by travellers from Brazil.

Authors:  Eduardo Massad; Ser-Han Tan; Kamran Khan; Annelies Wilder-Smith
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.640

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Experience of a neurology service during the 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games.

Authors:  Ivan R F da Silva; Luciano Gouvea; Carlos Bruno Nogueira; Victor Cravo; Bernardo B Liberato
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2018-12

2.  Mobile based surveillance platform for detecting Zika virus among Spanish Delegates attending the Rio de Janeiro Olympic Games.

Authors:  Natalia Rodriguez-Valero; Miguel Luengo Oroz; Daniel Cuadrado Sanchez; Alexander Vladimirov; Marina Espriu; Isabel Vera; Sergi Sanz; Jose Luis Gonzalez Moreno; Jose Muñoz; Maria Jesus Ledesma Carbayo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Participatory Surveillance Based on Crowdsourcing During the Rio 2016 Olympic Games Using the Guardians of Health Platform: Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Onicio Leal Neto; Oswaldo Cruz; Jones Albuquerque; Mariana Nacarato de Sousa; Mark Smolinski; Eduarda Ângela Pessoa Cesse; Marlo Libel; Wayner Vieira de Souza
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2020-04-07

Review 4.  Mass gatherings medicine: public health issues arising from mass gathering religious and sporting events.

Authors:  Ziad A Memish; Robert Steffen; Paul White; Osman Dar; Esam I Azhar; Avinash Sharma; Alimuddin Zumla
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.