| Literature DB >> 28627636 |
Katarzyna Dettlaff1, Maciej Stawny1, Magdalena Ogrodowczyk1, Anna Jelińska1, Waldemar Bednarski2, Dorota Wątróbska-Świetlikowska3, Rick W Keck4, Omar A Khan4, Ibrahim H Mostafa4, Jerzy Jankun4.
Abstract
In the United States, the annual incidence of bladder cancer is approximately 70,000 new cases, with a mortality rate of approximately 15,000/year. The most common subtype (70%) of bladder cancer is superficial, namely hte non-muscle invasive disease form limited to the urothelium. The rate of progression and recurrence is up to 40 and 70%, respectively. Urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder is typically treated with transurethral resection. The cancerous cells can float onto the adjacent epithelium, increasing the risk of recurrence. The standard of care is to offer adjuvant intravesical agents to reduce the risk of progression and recurrence. Current intravesical treatments are costly and are associated with special biohazard handling protocols. Patients are treated with intravesical therapy with bacillus Calmetter‑Guerin (BCG) bacterium, or mitomycin C (MMC) following resection, both of which can cause moderate to severe side-effects which are rarely life-threatening. We previously examined the efficacy of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) in comparison with MMC to prevent tumor cell implantation/growth in an animal model of superficial bladder cancer. Experiments revile that EGCG is slightly more effective than MMC at decreasing tumor cell implantation and consequent cancer growth in a bladder. This treatment requires the stringent sterile requirement of EGCG. EGCG can be unstable when sterilized at high temperatures. Thus, we evaluated two low temperature sterilization methods, such as ionizing radiation or the filtration method followed by freeze-drying. Both methods ensure the sterility of the sample; however, infrared and HPLC analysis revealed a slightly better stability of irradiated EGCG over the filtration method. The concentration of stable free radicals following irradiation was low, which are unlikely to exert any damaging effects to EGCG. Therefore, we consider that radiation will be the preferred method of EGCG sterilization, and that this may prove useful for the effective use of EGCG in the treatment of bladder cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28627636 PMCID: PMC5504970 DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2017.3024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Med ISSN: 1107-3756 Impact factor: 4.101
Figure 1Structure of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG).
Figure 2(A) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) before and after irradiation. (B) FTIR spectra of EGCG before and after filtration and lyophilization.
Parameters of EGCG melting point before and after irradiation.
| Dose (kGy) | Beginning of melting process Tb (°C) | End of melting process Te (°C) | ΔTe-Tb (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 202.2 | 206.2 | 4.0 |
| 25 | 202.3 | 206.2 | 3.9 |
| 100 | 201.2 | 204.0 | 3.8 |
| 200 | 200.9 | 203.8 | 3.8 |
EGCG, epigallocatechin-3-gallate.
Figure 3Ultraviolet (UV) spectra of epigallocatechin-3-gallate solutions before and after the sterilization processes.
Figure 4HPLC chromatograms of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) before and after the sterilization processes.
Figure 5Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra of unirradiated and irradiated epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) recorded 24 h after irradiation.
Figure 6Free radical concentration for unirradiated and irradiated epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) vs. time, symbols - experimental points, lines - approximations according to equation 1.
Parameters describing the concentration of free radicals vs. time for no irradiated and irradiated EGCG.
| Samples | Initial concentration of radicals at t=0 C(t=0) = Cf + C0 (ppm) | Concentration of stable radicals Cf (ppm) | Concentration of unstable radicals at t=0 C0 (ppm) | Mean lifetime of unstable radicals T0 (h) | Half-life of unstable radicals T1/2 (h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 kGy | 0.13±0.5 | 0.13±0.5 | – | – | – |
| 25 kGy | 1.18±0.11 | 0.35±0.02 | 0.83±0.09 | 61.8±10.4 | 42.8±7.2 |
| 100 kGy | 1.98±0.26 | 0.62±0.06 | 1.36±0.20 | 66.4±15.4 | 46.0±10.6 |
| 200 kGy | 2.02±0.16 | 0.64±0.04 | 1.38±0.12 | 71.6±10.0 | 49.6±6.9 |
EGCG, epigallocatechin-3-gallate.
Figure 7Concentration of free radicals after irradiation (25 kGy dose) for epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) and other drugs (CL, clotrimazole; KK, ketoconazole; DAU, daunorubicin; COD, codeine phosphate; PIL, pilocarpine hydrochloride; THF, thiamphenicol) (57-64).