Literature DB >> 28627033

Silodosin versus naftopidil in the treatment of premature ejaculation: A prospective multicenter trial.

Yoshikazu Sato1, Toshikazu Otani2, Toshiyasu Amano3, Tohru Araki4, Nobuyuki Kondou5, Masanori Matsukawa6, Musashi Tobe1, Kazunori Haga1, Kousuke Uchida1, Ichiya Honma1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of two α1-adrenoceptor antagonists with different affinities for α1-adrenoceptor subtypes, silodosin and naftopidil, in the treatment of premature ejaculation.
METHODS: This was a prospective, open-label, multicenter trial. A total of 26 patients with untreated acquired premature ejaculation were enrolled. Premature ejaculation was defined based on the International Society for Sexual Medicine recommendation. Patients self-administered on demand silodosin 4 mg or naftopidil 25 mg 1 h before intercourse, alternating drugs at least three times each. Clinical global impression change for premature ejaculation, premature ejaculation profile, and intravaginal ejaculation latency time were evaluated at baseline and during treatment.
RESULTS: Due to clinical global impression change, 24 patients (92%) and 12 patients (46%) reported improvement in their own premature ejaculation problems under silodosin and nafitopidil administration, respectively. Silodosin treatment produced a significantly higher improvement rate compared with naftopidil (P = 0.0002). Objectively, silodosin significantly prolonged intravaginal ejaculation latency time compared with baseline and naftopidil (P < 0.01). Mean intravaginal ejaculation latency times were 1.9, 4.1, and 7.6 min at baseline, control and with silodosin, respectively. The rate of reduced semen volume during silodosin treatment was higher than during naftopidil treatment. There were no adverse systemic effects in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: Silodosin, a highly selective α1A-adrenoceptor antagonist, produces greater improvements in premature ejaculation profiles and related symptoms along with intravaginal ejaculation latency time in acquired premature ejaculation patients with or without erectile dysfunction. This result supports the clinical use of silodosin as an alternative treatment for premature ejaculation.
© 2017 The Japanese Urological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intravaginal ejaculatory latency time; naftopidil; premature ejaculation; silodosin; α1-adrenoceptor antagonists

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28627033     DOI: 10.1111/iju.13392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current and emerging treatment options for premature ejaculation.

Authors:  Murat Gul; Kadir Bocu; Ege Can Serefoglu
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 16.430

Review 2.  Clinical review of ejaculatory dysfunction.

Authors:  Toshikazu Otani
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2019-07-24

Review 3.  Progresses in pharmaceutical and surgical management of premature ejaculation.

Authors:  Qin-Bo Hu; Dong Zhang; Liang Ma; Derry Mingyao Ng; Maria Haleem; Qi Ma
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-10-05       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 4.  Evolving Role of Silodosin for the Treatment of Urological Disorders - A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Luo Jindan; Wang Xiao; Xie Liping
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.319

5.  Premature ejaculation in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms: a systematic review.

Authors:  Retta Catherina Sihotang; Timotius Alvonico; Akmal Taher; Ponco Birowo; Nur Rasyid; Widi Atmoko
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.896

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.