J Ramkrishna1,2, G R Kan1,2, K L Reidy1,2, W C Ang2,3, R Palma-Dias1,3,4. 1. Ultrasound Department, Pauline Gandel Women's Imaging Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Vic., Australia. 2. Department of Gynaecology, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Vic., Australia. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Royal Women's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia. 4. Pregnancy Research Centre, Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Vic., Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review management options for nontubal ectopic pregnancies. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia. POPULATION: A total of 100 nontubal pregnancies: 1 abdominal, 32 caesarean scar, 14 cervical, 41 cornual-interstitial, 12 ovarian. METHODS: Cases were classified according to ectopic site. Management categories were medical, surgical, combination or expectant. Use of minimally invasive approaches (ultrasound-guided intra-sac injections or selective surgical techniques) was identified. Primary management was considered to be successful if no further unplanned interventions were required. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Success of primary management and frequency of unplanned interventions. RESULTS: A high rate of success (82%) was demonstrated for all management regimens, with minimal morbidity and no deaths occurring. A high success rate was shown when the primary management regimen was systemic methotrexate or ultrasound-guided intra-sac injection (88%). The success rate for primary surgical management was 57%. High success rates were reported for both primary management with ultrasound-guided injections or in combination with systemic methotrexate (94%) and for primary management with systemic methotrexate alone (81%). Seventy-five per cent of women managed with minimally invasive surgical approaches avoided the need for more extensive surgery, but required longer follow up and additional interventions. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive approaches were found to be safe and effective treatment for women desiring to conserve fertility. Ultrasound-guided intra-sac injection and laparoscopic ectopic removal procedures aimed at preserving reproductive organs should be included as minimally invasive primary management tools in addition to the well-recognised option of systemic methotrexate. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Nontubal ectopics: minimally invasive procedures a safe alternative to surgery in selected cases.
OBJECTIVE: To review management options for nontubal ectopic pregnancies. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia. POPULATION: A total of 100 nontubal pregnancies: 1 abdominal, 32 caesarean scar, 14 cervical, 41 cornual-interstitial, 12 ovarian. METHODS: Cases were classified according to ectopic site. Management categories were medical, surgical, combination or expectant. Use of minimally invasive approaches (ultrasound-guided intra-sac injections or selective surgical techniques) was identified. Primary management was considered to be successful if no further unplanned interventions were required. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Success of primary management and frequency of unplanned interventions. RESULTS: A high rate of success (82%) was demonstrated for all management regimens, with minimal morbidity and no deaths occurring. A high success rate was shown when the primary management regimen was systemic methotrexate or ultrasound-guided intra-sac injection (88%). The success rate for primary surgical management was 57%. High success rates were reported for both primary management with ultrasound-guided injections or in combination with systemic methotrexate (94%) and for primary management with systemic methotrexate alone (81%). Seventy-five per cent of women managed with minimally invasive surgical approaches avoided the need for more extensive surgery, but required longer follow up and additional interventions. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive approaches were found to be safe and effective treatment for women desiring to conserve fertility. Ultrasound-guided intra-sac injection and laparoscopic ectopic removal procedures aimed at preserving reproductive organs should be included as minimally invasive primary management tools in addition to the well-recognised option of systemic methotrexate. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Nontubal ectopics: minimally invasive procedures a safe alternative to surgery in selected cases.
Authors: P Casadio; A Arena; L Verrelli; M Ambrosio; M Fabbri; K Giovannico; G Magnarelli; R Seracchioli Journal: Facts Views Vis Obgyn Date: 2021-03-31