Literature DB >> 28626784

Acute liver injury in a Glatopa-treated patient with MS.

Joseph J Sabatino1, Neil J Mehta1, Sanjay Kakar1, Scott S Zamvil1, Bruce A C Cree1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28626784      PMCID: PMC5459788          DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm        ISSN: 2332-7812


× No keyword cloud information.
Hepatotoxicity is rarely associated with glatiramer acetate (GA) treatment of relapsing MS. Here, we report a case of acute liver injury associated with generic GA (Glatopa, manufactured by Sandoz, a Novartis company, Holzkirchen, Upper Bavaria, Germany).

Case report.

A 36-year-old woman presented with unilateral optic neuritis from which she recovered. Optic neuritis recurred at age 42. Brain MRI showed multiple T2-hyperintense white matter lesions and a gadoliniumdiethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid–enhancing lesion. MS was diagnosed. The patient was treated with methylprednisolone 1 g/daily IV for 5 days. Concomitant medications included norethindrone/ethinyl estradiol with iron, vitamin D, calcium, and vitamin B12. The patient did not take supplements or abuse alcohol. Approximately 3 weeks later, the patient was started on generic GA. Influenza and meningococcal oligosaccharide vaccines were administered at the time she began GA. Because of symptoms of injection pain, fatigue, nausea, and constipation, the patient discontinued GA after 13 daily injections. The following day, the patient developed worsening nausea with vomiting, dyspnea with exertion, anorexia, fatigue, dark urine, and jaundice. The patient was found to have elevated liver function tests (aspartate aminotransferase = 1,188 U/L, alanine transaminase = 1,879 U/L, alkaline phosphatase = 177 U/L, and total bilirubin = 3.6 mg/dL) compared with normal values just 1 month prior (figure, A). The following laboratory values were negative or normal: HAV IgM, HBsAg, HBcAg IgG, HCV RNA, HCV antibody, HEV IgM, EBV IgM, CMV IgM, HIV, HSV PCR, urine toxicology screen, acetaminophen levels, ANA, and anti–smooth muscle antibody. HAV IgG, HBsAb, HEV IgG, and EBV IgG were positive. Twenty-four–hour urine copper (193 μg/24 h [normal range 15–60 μg/24 h]) was presumed to be elevated secondary to acute liver injury.
Figure

Liver injury after glatiramer acetate treatment

Liver function tests (panel A) were performed from February 17, 2016 (32 days prior to glatiramer acetate [GA]) to June 13, 2016 (102 days following the start of GA treatment). The gray rectangle represents the 13 days of GA treatment starting at day 0. Alanine transaminase (ALT) (normal range 10–30 U/L) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (normal range 6–29 U/L) are depicted on the left y-axis and alkaline phosphatase (alk phos [normal range 33–115 U/L]) on the right y-axis. Liver biopsy (indicated by “Bx” on panel A) on day 20 shows dense portal lymphocytic inflammation (panel B) with interface activity and normal bile ducts and shows lobular lymphocytic inflammation with confluent necrosis (panel C) (hematoxylin and eosin stain, 200×). This histologic picture along with the clinical presentation and temporal profile is consistent with drug-induced liver injury.

Liver injury after glatiramer acetate treatment

Liver function tests (panel A) were performed from February 17, 2016 (32 days prior to glatiramer acetate [GA]) to June 13, 2016 (102 days following the start of GA treatment). The gray rectangle represents the 13 days of GA treatment starting at day 0. Alanine transaminase (ALT) (normal range 10–30 U/L) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (normal range 6–29 U/L) are depicted on the left y-axis and alkaline phosphatase (alk phos [normal range 33–115 U/L]) on the right y-axis. Liver biopsy (indicated by “Bx” on panel A) on day 20 shows dense portal lymphocytic inflammation (panel B) with interface activity and normal bile ducts and shows lobular lymphocytic inflammation with confluent necrosis (panel C) (hematoxylin and eosin stain, 200×). This histologic picture along with the clinical presentation and temporal profile is consistent with drug-induced liver injury. A liver biopsy showed severe portal, interface and panacinar, lymphocyte-predominant inflammation, with confluent necrosis, numerous apoptotic hepatocytes, and central perivenulitis (figure, B and C). The bile ducts were intact, and there was no significant ductular reaction. Steatosis, cholestasis, and fibrosis were not present. The patient was treated with IV corticosteroids followed by a several month taper of prednisone for possible autoimmune hepatitis. The patient's liver function tests normalized within 2 months.

Discussion.

GA is a synthetic random copolymer of 4 amino acids (glutamic acid, lysine, alanine, and tyrosine) approved for treatment of relapsing-remitting MS. With more than 2,000,000 patient-years of exposure to GA, there are 13 published cases of hepatotoxicity (table e-1 at Neurology.org/nn). Previously reported cases are notable for prior treatment with interferon β, concomitant use of other potentially hepatotoxic drugs, and symptom onset 1–8 months after initiating GA. We report a rare case of acute liver injury in the setting of generic GA use. Liver injury associated with GA presents with a hepatocellular injury pattern without hyperglobulinemia, although autoimmune hepatitis can occur (Supplemental Table). Given our patient's negative autoimmune markers, lack of plasma cells on biopsy, and resolution of liver injury on a rapid prednisone taper, it is unlikely that this patient had autoimmune hepatitis. The administration of influenza and meningococcal vaccines seems unlikely to be contributory because neither vaccine is hepatotoxic. Seven years prior to the diagnosis of MS, our patient had a history of transaminitis, which was attributed to a viral etiology (associated with serologic evidence of prior hepatitis A and hepatitis E virus exposure), followed by many years of normal liver enzymes. GA is classified as a nonbiological complex drug (NBCD) whose composition and in vivo activity are highly dependent on manufacturing processes.[1,2] Systemic toxicities are extremely rare with GA, and there are no guidelines for drug safety monitoring. In prior clinical trials of Copaxone and generic GA, the incidence of liver dysfunction was equivalent to that of placebo-treated patients.[3] Since approval, over 300 cases of Copaxone-associated liver-related abnormalities were reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA). In animal studies, transaminase elevations were observed with chronic high-dose GA. Significant hepatotoxicity, nephropathy, and skin reactions also occurred with protiramer (TV-5010), a glatiramoid with a higher molecular weight of the same molar ratio of amino acids as GA.[4] Glatopa was approved as a GA biosimilar compound in 2015 without a requirement for proof of either efficacy or safety in clinical trials. Sandoz demonstrated Glatopa's equivalence with Copaxone by similarities in chemistry, polymerization, biological, and immunologic properties.[5,6] In a study by the US-FDA using 3 different analytic measures, distinct physicochemical differences were found between Copaxone and commercially available copolymer-1.[7] Teva Pharmaceuticals also found differences in charge distribution, molecular density, monomolecular size, and the existence of a novel polypeptide group in Glatopa compared with Copaxone.[2] Therefore, differences in manufacturing between these NBCDs could cause different adverse event profiles. Given that generic GA is only recently available for clinical use in MS and is the likely cause of acute liver injury in the present case report, heightened awareness of possible liver dysfunction and other adverse effects may be warranted.
  6 in total

Review 1.  Glatiramer acetate: a review of its use in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and in delaying the onset of clinically definite multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Natalie J Carter; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Comparative long-term preclinical safety evaluation of two glatiramoid compounds (glatiramer Acetate, Copaxone(R), and TV-5010, protiramer) in rats and monkeys.

Authors:  Yuval Ramot; Moti Rosenstock; Ety Klinger; Dizza Bursztyn; Abraham Nyska; Doron M Shinar
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 1.902

3.  Equivalence of Generic Glatiramer Acetate in Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey Cohen; Anna Belova; Krzysztof Selmaj; Christian Wolf; Maria Pia Sormani; Janine Oberyé; Evelyn van den Tweel; Roel Mulder; Norbert Koper; Gerrit Voortman; Frederik Barkhof
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 18.302

4.  Modern analytics for synthetically derived complex drug substances: NMR, AFFF-MALS, and MS tests for glatiramer acetate.

Authors:  Sarah Rogstad; Eric Pang; Cynthia Sommers; Meng Hu; Xiaohui Jiang; David A Keire; Michael T Boyne
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 5.  Demonstration of equivalence of a generic glatiramer acetate (Glatopa™).

Authors:  James Anderson; Christine Bell; John Bishop; Ishan Capila; Tanmoy Ganguly; Joseph Glajch; Mani Iyer; Ganesh Kaundinya; Jonathan Lansing; Joel Pradines; James Prescott; Bruce A Cohen; Daniel Kantor; Richard Sachleben
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.181

6.  Equivalent Gene Expression Profiles between Glatopa™ and Copaxone®.

Authors:  Josephine S D'Alessandro; Jay Duffner; Joel Pradines; Ishan Capila; Kevin Garofalo; Ganesh Kaundinya; Benjamin M Greenberg; Daniel Kantor; Tanmoy C Ganguly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Highlights and Controversies in the Recent Literature.

Authors:  Joseph William Clinton; Sara Kiparizoska; Soorya Aggarwal; Stephanie Woo; William Davis; James H Lewis
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 5.606

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.