| Literature DB >> 28626649 |
Shenghua He1, Yibing Qin2, Elfalleh Walid3, Lin Li1, Jie Cui1, Ying Ma1.
Abstract
The effect of ball-milling on physicochemical properties of maize starch was evaluated. Results found that the cold water solubility (CWS) of maize starch was positively correlated with the time of milling up to 3 h. There was no significant influence of using a ceramic pot versus a stainless steel pot on CWS. However, following 5 h of ball-milling CWS increased quite dramatically in the ceramic pot (72.6%) and in the stainless steel pot (70.7%), as compared to the untreated maize starches (2.9%). In addition, as CWS increased, the regions of amorphism enlarged at the expense of the crystalline regions, resulting in a change from the native starch state (oval with a smooth surface) to having more of a rough, abrasive surface. Finally, the transparency of the starch increased as CWS increased and that the syneresis of freeze-thawed ball-milled maize starch also increased with an increase in the number of freeze-thaw cycles.Entities:
Keywords: Ball-milling; Maize starch; Physicochemical properties
Year: 2014 PMID: 28626649 PMCID: PMC5466096 DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2014.06.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Rep (Amst) ISSN: 2215-017X
Size characteristics of starch granules treated with ball-milling for 5 h.
| D(v, 0.1)/μm | D(v, 0.5)/μm | D(v, 0.9)/μm | Span | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ceramic pot | 10.7 ± 0.1b | 42.5 ± 0.3b | 135.3 ± 1.9b | 2.9 ± 0.2b |
| Stainless steel pot | 17.2 ± 0.8c | 58.3 ± 0.5c | 240.2 ± 8.3c | 3.8 ± 0.4c |
| Native maize starch | 7.7 ± 0.1a | 16.1 ± 0.1a | 32.1 ± 0.1a | 1.5 ± 0.1a |
D(v, 0.1) and D(v, 0.9) represent the particle diameters with cumulative particle volumes of 10% and 90%, respectively; D(v, 0.5), median diameter.
Span: size dispersion index.
Values followed by the same letter within a column do not differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Fig. 1The effect of ball-milling time on the cold water solubility of maize starch.
Fig. 2X-ray diffractometry of maize starch with different cold-water solubility in (A) ceramic pots and (B) stainless steel pots.
Fig. 3Representative scanning electron micrographs of (A) untreated maize starch, (B) maize starch treated by ball-milling in ceramic pots, and (C) maize starch treated by ball-milling in stainless steel pots.
Fig. 4Representative scanning electron micrographs of cold-water insoluble (A) untreated maize starch, (B) maize starch treated by ball-milling in ceramic pots, and (C) maize starch treated by ball-milling in stainless steel pots.
Fig. 5The transparency of maize starch with increasing cold-water solubility.
Fig. 6Syneresis of ball-milled maize starch following freeze–thaw.