Literature DB >> 28625964

Antegrade Dissection and Reentry as Part of the Hybrid Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization Strategy: A Subanalysis of the RECHARGE Registry (Registry of CrossBoss and Hybrid Procedures in France, the Netherlands, Belgium and United Kingdom).

Joren Maeremans1, Jo Dens2, James C Spratt1, Alan J Bagnall1, Wynand Stuijfzand1, Alexander Nap1, Pierfrancesco Agostoni1, William Wilson1, Colm G Hanratty1, Simon Wilson1, Benjamin Faurie1, Alexandre Avran1, Erwan Bressollette1, Mohaned Egred1, Paul Knaapen1, Simon Walsh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Development of the CrossBoss and Stingray devices for antegrade dissection and reentry (ADR) of chronic total occlusions has improved historically suboptimal outcomes. However, the outcomes, safety, and failure modes of the technique have to be studied in a larger patient cohort. This preplanned substudy of the RECHARGE registry (Registry of CrossBoss and Hybrid Procedures in France, the Netherlands, Belgium and United Kingdom) aims to evaluate the value and use of ADR and determine its future position in contemporary chronic total occlusion intervention. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients were selected if an ADR strategy was applied. Outcomes, safety, and failure modes of the technique were assessed. The ADR technique was used in 23% (n=292/1253) of the RECHARGE registry and was mainly applied for complex lesions (Japanese chronic total occlusion score=2.7±1.1). ADR was the primary strategy in 30% (n=88/292), of which 67% were successful. Bail-out ADR strategies were successful in 63% (n=133/210). The Controlled ADR (ie, combined CrossBoss-Stingray) subtype was applied most frequently (32%; n=93/292) and successfully (81%; n=75/93). Overall per-lesion success rate was 78% (n=229/292), after use of additional bail-out strategies. The inability to reach the distal target zone (n=48/100) or to reenter (n=43/100) most commonly led to failure. ADR-associated major events occurred in 3.4% (n=10/292).
CONCLUSIONS: Although mostly applied as a bail-out strategy for complex lesions, the frequency, outcomes, and low complication rate of the ADR technique and its subtypes confirm the benefit and value of the technique in hybrid chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention, especially when antegrade wiring or retrograde approaches are not feasible. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02075372.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (coronary) chronic total occlusion; antegrade dissection and reentry; hybrid; percutaneous coronary intervention; registry

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28625964     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  9 in total

1.  Does the hybrid algorithm has real impact on long-term outcomes or should only be used as a valuable approach for CTO crossing?

Authors:  Peter Tajti; Emmanouil S Brilakis
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Knuckle wire technique in percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion: Knuckle wire technique.

Authors:  Sharath A Reddy; Ajith Ananthakrishna Pillai; Bharath Reddy; Venkat Rao; Aparajita Deshpande
Journal:  AsiaIntervention       Date:  2020-12-02

3.  Retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention in a calcified and dissected left anterior descending artery using single catheter - To lose the patience is to lose the battle.

Authors:  Prathap Kumar; Blessvin Jino; Ali Shafeeq; Stalin Roy; Manu Rajendran
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2022-04-08

4.  A new buddy stingray and stick technique for antegrade dissection and re-entry during chronic total occlusion recanalization: a case report.

Authors:  Bing Tian; Quan-Min Jing; Bin Wang; Yan-Bin Su
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  Advances in CrossBoss/Stingray use in antegrade dissection reentry from the Asia Pacific Chronic Total Occlusion Club.

Authors:  Eugene B Wu; Emmanouil S Brilakis; Sidney Lo; Arun Kalyanasundaram; Kambis Mashayekhi; Hsien-Li Kao; Soo-Teik Lim; Lei Ge; Ji-Yan Chen; Jie Qian; Seung-Whan Lee; Scott A Harding; Etsuo Tsuchikane
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence and Controversies.

Authors:  Peter Tajti; Emmanouil S Brilakis
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  In-hospital outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with and without prior coronary artery bypass graft: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.

Authors:  Mei-Jun Liu; Chao-Feng Chen; Xiao-Fei Gao; Xiao-Hua Liu; Yi-Zhou Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Factors associated with antegrade true-sub-true phenomenon in percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion.

Authors:  Kei Yamamoto; Kenichi Sakakura; Takunori Tsukui; Masaru Seguchi; Yousuke Taniguchi; Hiroshi Wada; Shin-Ichi Momomura; Hideo Fujita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Japanese multicenter registry evaluating the antegrade dissection reentry with cardiac computerized tomography for chronic coronary total occlusion.

Authors:  Maoto Habara; Etsuo Tsuchikane; Kazuki Shimizu; Yoshifumi Kashima; Kenichiro Shimoji; Shigeru Nakamura; Takeshi Niizeki; Takaki Tsutsumi; Yoshiaki Ito; Tomohiro Kawasaki
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2021-02-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.