Literature DB >> 28625664

Effects of different numbers of mini-dental implants on alveolar ridge strain distribution under mandibular implant-retained overdentures.

Pongsakorn Warin1, Pimduen Rungsiyakull2, Chaiy Rungsiyakull3, Pathawee Khongkhunthian4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the strains around mini-dental implants (MDIs) and retromolar edentulous areas when using different numbers of MDIs in order to retain mandibular overdentures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four different prosthetic situations were fabricated on an edentulous mandibular model including a complete denture (CD), and three overdentures, retained by four, three or two MDIs in the interforaminal region with retentive attachments. A static load of 200N was applied on the posterior teeth of the dentures under bilateral or unilateral loading conditions. The strains at the mesial and distal of the MDIs and the retromolar edentulous ridges were measured using twelve strain gauges. Comparisons of the mean microstrains among all strain gauges in all situations were analyzed.
RESULTS: The strain distribution determined during bilateral loading experienced a symmetrical distribution; while during unilateral loading, the recorded strains tended to change from compressive strains on the loaded side to tensile strains. Overall, the number of MDIs was found to be passively correlated to the generated compressive strain. The highest strains were recorded in the four MDIs followed by three, two MDIs retained overdenture and CD situations, respectively. The highest strain was found around the terminal MDI.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a low number of MDIs tends to produce low strain values in the retromolar denture-bearing area and around the terminal MDIs during posterior loadings. However, when using a high number of MDIs, the overdenture tends to have more stability during function.
Copyright © 2017 Japan Prosthodontic Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Alveolar ridges; Mandibular implant-retained overdenture; Mini-dental implant; Strain distribution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28625664     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont Res        ISSN: 1883-1958            Impact factor:   4.642


  6 in total

1.  The Effect of Number and Distribution of Mini Dental Implants on Overdenture Stability: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Rafif Alshenaiber; Craig Barclay; Nick Silikas
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Mini Dental Implant-Retained Removable Partial Dentures: Treatment Effect Size and 6-Months Follow-up.

Authors:  Visar Disha; Asja Čelebić; Ksenija Rener-Sitar; Ines Kovačić; Irina Filipović-Zore; Sanja Peršić
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2018-09

3.  Effect of Number and Location on Stress Distribution of Mini Dental Implant-Assisted Mandibular Kennedy Class I Removable Partial Denture: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Wissanee Jia-Mahasap; Chaiy Rungsiyakull; Wipahatpong Bumrungsiri; Natthaphorn Sirisereephap; Pimduen Rungsiyakull
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-03-26

4.  Stress Distribution Pattern in Mini Dental Implant-Assisted RPD with Different Clasp Designs: 3D Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Chaiy Rungsiyakull; Pimduen Rungsiyakull; Kullapop Suttiat; Nut Duangrattanaprathip
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-03-11

5.  Effect of the Location of Dental Mini-Implants on Strain Distribution under Mandibular Kennedy Class I Implant-Retained Removable Partial Dentures.

Authors:  Pimduen Rungsiyakull; Kallaya Kujarearntaworn; Pathawee Khongkhunthian; Michael Swain; Chaiy Rungsiyakull
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-05-04

6.  Classification of the journal category "oral surgery" in the Scopus and the Science Citation Index Expanded: flaws and suggestions.

Authors:  Seong-Gon Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-08-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.