Literature DB >> 28625355

Meta-Reasoning: Monitoring and Control of Thinking and Reasoning.

Rakefet Ackerman1, Valerie A Thompson2.   

Abstract

Meta-Reasoning refers to the processes that monitor the progress of our reasoning and problem-solving activities and regulate the time and effort devoted to them. Monitoring processes are usually experienced as feelings of certainty or uncertainty about how well a process has, or will, unfold. These feelings are based on heuristic cues, which are not necessarily reliable. Nevertheless, we rely on these feelings of (un)certainty to regulate our mental effort. Most metacognitive research has focused on memorization and knowledge retrieval, with little attention paid to more complex processes, such as reasoning and problem solving. In that context, we recently developed a Meta-Reasoning framework, used here to review existing findings, consider their consequences, and frame questions for future research.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  effort regulation; metacognition; monitoring and control; problem solving; reasoning

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28625355     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  10 in total

Review 1.  Lessons Learned and Future Directions of MetaTutor: Leveraging Multichannel Data to Scaffold Self-Regulated Learning With an Intelligent Tutoring System.

Authors:  Roger Azevedo; François Bouchet; Melissa Duffy; Jason Harley; Michelle Taub; Gregory Trevors; Elizabeth Cloude; Daryn Dever; Megan Wiedbusch; Franz Wortha; Rebeca Cerezo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-14

2.  Confidence in COVID problem solving: What factors predict adults' item-level metacognitive judgments on health-related math problems before and after an educational intervention?

Authors:  Daniel A Scheibe; Charles J Fitzsimmons; Marta K Mielicki; Jennifer M Taber; Pooja G Sidney; Karin Coifman; Clarissa A Thompson
Journal:  Metacogn Learn       Date:  2022-05-24

3.  Effects on Memory of Early Testing and Accuracy Assessment for Central and Contextual Content.

Authors:  Jessica S Wasserman; Cody W Polack; Crystal Casado; Maïte Brune; Mohamad El Haj; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2020-08-24

4.  Math anxiety relates positively to metacognitive insight into mathematical decision making.

Authors:  Kobe Desender; Delphine Sasanguie
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-05-18

5.  Judgements of effort as a function of post-trial versus post-task elicitation.

Authors:  Michelle Ashburner; Evan F Risko
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Motivational Reasons for Biased Decisions: The Sunk-Cost Effect's Instrumental Rationality.

Authors:  Markus Domeier; Pierre Sachse; Bernd Schäfer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-24

7.  Metacognitive Awareness Scale, Domain Specific (MCAS-DS): Assessing Metacognitive Awareness During Raven's Progressive Matrices.

Authors:  John H H Song; Sasha Loyal; Benjamin Lond
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-01-06

8.  Viruses, Vaccines, and COVID-19: Explaining and Improving Risky Decision-making.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; David A Broniatowski; Sarah M Edelson
Journal:  J Appl Res Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-12-13

9.  Differences in the distribution of attention to trained procedure between finders and non-finders of the alternative better procedure.

Authors:  Yuki Ninomiya; Hitoshi Terai; Kazuhisa Miwa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-23

Review 10.  Reactivity to Measures of Metacognition.

Authors:  Kit S Double; Damian P Birney
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.