Literature DB >> 28625197

Do not confuse multidisciplinary task management in nursing homes with interprofessional care!

Giannoula Tsakitzidis1, Sibyl Anthierens2, Olaf Timmermans3, Steven Truijen4, Herman Meulemans5, Paul Van Royen1.   

Abstract

Problem statement Little is known about how interprofessional healthcare providers in nursing homes work together. We know that interprofessional teamwork evolves from trial and error learning and so interprofessional collaboration has to be actively taught. This study aims to gain insights in the perception of professionals towards interprofessional collaboration in nursing homes and the factors that have an impact on interprofessional collaboration. Approach A qualitative descriptive methodology using focus group interviews and additional semi-structured interviews was performed. In total three focus group sessions with healthcare providers from different disciplines were held and additionally nine semi-structured interviews were executed. A thematic analysis was performed. The transcripts were read to immerse in the data and initial ideas were noted. Both open coding (identification of primary themes) and axial coding (analysis of relationships among themes) were conducted and re-focussed into potential themes. Findings Four main themes emerge from the analysis: context, collaboration, care and experience. From the findings it seems that healthcare teams in nursing homes work as 'separated groups'. A lot of collaboration is perceived, but no common vision or responsibility sharing is found. The role description of the different disciplines does not always seem clear or is not always explicit.
CONCLUSION: In usual care the perceived interactions between professionals are called collaboration. Obviously physicians and all healthcare professionals do not work interprofessionally according to definitions from the literature. This study provided evidence of the awareness that interprofessional collaboration in usual care is situational and fragmentary organised.

Entities:  

Keywords:  collaboration; education; integrated; interprofessional; nursing homes

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28625197     DOI: 10.1017/S146342361700024X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev        ISSN: 1463-4236            Impact factor:   1.458


  4 in total

1.  Acceptability of a task sharing and shifting model between family physicians and physiotherapists in French multidisciplinary primary healthcare centres: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Amélie Kechichian; François Desmeules; Pauline Girard; Nicolas Pinsault
Journal:  Fam Med Community Health       Date:  2022-06

2.  Drug Safety for Nursing-Home Residents-Findings of a Pragmatic, Cluster-Randomized, Controlled Intervention Trialin 44 Nursing Homes.

Authors:  Ulrike Junius-Walker; Olaf Krause; Petra Thürmann; Simone Bernhard; Angela Fuchs; Lisa Sparenberg; Anja Wollny; Regina Stolz; Hannah Haumann; Antje Freytag; Claudia Kirsch; Svetlana Usacheva; Stefan Wilm; Birgitt Wiese
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Training in Interprofessional Learning and Collaboration: An Evaluation of the Interprofessional Education Program in the Scale-up Phase in Antwerp (Belgium).

Authors:  Giannoula Tsakitzidis; Josefien Van Olmen; Paul Van Royen
Journal:  Zdr Varst       Date:  2021-06-28

Review 4.  Nurses and Pharmaceutical Care: Interprofessional, Evidence-Based Working to Improve Patient Care and Outcomes.

Authors:  Tinne Dilles; Jana Heczkova; Styliani Tziaferi; Ann Karin Helgesen; Vigdis Abrahamsen Grøndahl; Bart Van Rompaey; Carolien G Sino; Sue Jordan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.