Felicity N R Harl1, Megan C Saucke1, Caprice C Greenberg1, Angela M Ingraham2. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin. Electronic address: ingraham@surgery.wisc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Poor communication causes fragmented care. Studies of transitions of care within a hospital and on discharge suggest significant communication deficits. Communication during transfers between hospitals has not been well studied. We assessed the written communication provided during interhospital transfers of emergency general surgery patients. We hypothesized that patients are transferred with incomplete documentation from referring facilities. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of written communication provided during interhospital transfers to our emergency department (ED) from referring EDs for emergency general surgical evaluation between January 1, 2014 and January 1, 2016. Elements of written communication were abstracted from referring facility documents scanned into the medical record using a standardized abstraction protocol. Descriptive statistics summarized the information communicated. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients met inclusion criteria. 87.6% (n = 113) of charts contained referring hospital documents. 42.5% (n = 48) were missing history and physicals. Diagnoses were missing in 9.7% (n = 11). Ninety-one computed tomography scans were performed; among 70 with reads, final reads were absent for 70.0% (n = 49). 45 ultrasounds and x-rays were performed; among 27 with reads, final reads were missing for 80.0% (n = 36). Reasons for transfer were missing in 18.6% (n = 21). Referring hospital physicians outside the ED were consulted in 32.7% (n = 37); consultants' notes were absent in 89.2% (n = 33). In 12.4% (n = 14), referring documents arrived after the patient's ED arrival and were not part of the original documentation provided. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents that information important to patient care is often missing in the written communication provided during interhospital transfers. This gap affords a foundation for standardizing provider communication during interhospital transfers.
BACKGROUND:Poor communication causes fragmented care. Studies of transitions of care within a hospital and on discharge suggest significant communication deficits. Communication during transfers between hospitals has not been well studied. We assessed the written communication provided during interhospital transfers of emergency general surgery patients. We hypothesized that patients are transferred with incomplete documentation from referring facilities. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of written communication provided during interhospital transfers to our emergency department (ED) from referring EDs for emergency general surgical evaluation between January 1, 2014 and January 1, 2016. Elements of written communication were abstracted from referring facility documents scanned into the medical record using a standardized abstraction protocol. Descriptive statistics summarized the information communicated. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients met inclusion criteria. 87.6% (n = 113) of charts contained referring hospital documents. 42.5% (n = 48) were missing history and physicals. Diagnoses were missing in 9.7% (n = 11). Ninety-one computed tomography scans were performed; among 70 with reads, final reads were absent for 70.0% (n = 49). 45 ultrasounds and x-rays were performed; among 27 with reads, final reads were missing for 80.0% (n = 36). Reasons for transfer were missing in 18.6% (n = 21). Referring hospital physicians outside the ED were consulted in 32.7% (n = 37); consultants' notes were absent in 89.2% (n = 33). In 12.4% (n = 14), referring documents arrived after the patient's ED arrival and were not part of the original documentation provided. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents that information important to patient care is often missing in the written communication provided during interhospital transfers. This gap affords a foundation for standardizing provider communication during interhospital transfers.
Authors: Kamal Nagpal; Amit Vats; Kamran Ahmed; Andrea B Smith; Nick Sevdalis; Helgi Jonannsson; Charles Vincent; Krishna Moorthy Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2010-06
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Howard Charles Malpass; Kyle B Enfield; Jessica Keim-Malpass; George M Verghese Journal: J Intensive Care Med Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 3.510
Authors: Kevin M Terrell; Edward J Brizendine; William F Bean; Beverly K Giles; James R Davidson; Stephanee Evers; Peter A Stier; William H Cordell Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Ken R Catchpole; Marc R de Leval; Angus McEwan; Nick Pigott; Martin J Elliott; Annette McQuillan; Carol MacDonald; Allan J Goldman Journal: Paediatr Anaesth Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.556
Authors: David Yu Greenblatt; Caprice C Greenberg; Amy J H Kind; Jeffrey A Havlena; Matthew W Mell; Matthew T Nelson; Maureen A Smith; K Craig Kent Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Nicholas R A Symons; Alex M Almoudaris; Kamal Nagpal; Charles A Vincent; Krishna Moorthy Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 12.969