Literature DB >> 28624034

Factors influencing failure to rescue after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Perspective.

Patrick R Varley1, David A Geller2, Allan Tsung2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Failure to rescue is the concept of death after a complication, and it is an important factor driving variation in mortality rates after pancreatic surgery. The purpose of this study was to conduct a retrospective review of a large, multi-institutional data set to describe patient-level risk factors for failure to rescue in greater detail.
METHODS: From the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program participant use file, 14,557 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy were identified. Of these, 4514 experienced at least one complication and were therefore at risk for failure to rescue. Multivariable logistic regression models to identify factors independently associated with failure to rescue.
RESULTS: Age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, ascites and/or varices, and disseminated malignancy were significant independent risk factors for failure to rescue. Participation of a resident was associated with reduced odds of failure to rescue. Patients who experienced an initial complication and then accumulated additional complications were more common in the failure to rescue group (68.6% versus 31.3%, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Accumulation of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy is a significant risk factor for failure to rescue. Pancreatic surgery quality improvement programs should continue developing strategies to identify and intervene on post-pancreatectomy complications, especially in high-risk patients.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Failure-to-rescue; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Quality; Whipple

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28624034     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  6 in total

Review 1.  Quality Versus Costs Related to Gastrointestinal Surgery: Disentangling the Value Proposition.

Authors:  Rohan Shah; Adrian Diaz; Marzia Tripepi; Fabio Bagante; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Nikolaos Machairas; Fragiska Sigala; Dimitrios Moris; Savio George Barreto; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Synergistic Effects of Perioperative Complications on 30-Day Mortality Following Hepatopancreatic Surgery.

Authors:  Katiuscha Merath; Qinyu Chen; Fabio Bagante; Ozgur Akgul; Jay J Idrees; Mary Dillhoff; Jordan M Cloyd; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Failure to rescue in surgical patients: A review for acute care surgeons.

Authors:  Justin S Hatchimonji; Elinore J Kaufman; Catherine E Sharoky; Lucy Ma; Anna E Garcia Whitlock; Daniel N Holena
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.313

4.  Mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy: assessing early and late causes of patient death.

Authors:  Sowmya Narayanan; Allison N Martin; Florence E Turrentine; Todd W Bauer; Reid B Adams; Victor M Zaydfudim
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Postoperative single-sequence (PoSSe) MRI: imaging work-up for CT-guided or endoscopic drainage indication of collections after hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery.

Authors:  Uli Fehrenbach; Timo A Auer; Wenzel Schöning; Moritz Schmelzle; Christian Jürgensen; Thomas Malinka; Marcus Bahra; Dominik Geisel; Timm Denecke
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-02-15

6.  Predictors of Reoperation and Failure to Rescue in Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Jeanie L Gribben; Nicole Ilonzo; Sean Neifert; I Michael Leitman
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.