| Literature DB >> 28623904 |
Phuong H Nguyen1,2, Ann M DiGirolamo3, Ines Gonzalez-Casanova4, Hoa Pham5, Wei Hao4, Hieu Nguyen5, Truong V Truong5, Son Nguyen5, Kimberly B Harding6, Gregory A Reinhart7, Reynaldo Martorell4, Usha Ramakrishnan4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Micronutrient malnutrition has been associated with maternal depressive symptoms (MDS), but little is known about the effects of preconceptional micronutrient supplementation. This paper examined the effects of preconceptional micronutrient supplementation on MDS during pregnancy and postpartum.Entities:
Keywords: Mental health; Multiple micronutrient; Preconception; Randomized controlled trial; Supplement; Vietnam; Women of reproductive age
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28623904 PMCID: PMC5473979 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-017-0401-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Womens Health ISSN: 1472-6874 Impact factor: 2.809
Fig. 1Flow diagram of participant progress throughout the study. EPDS - Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, FA - folic acid, IFA - iron and folic acid, MM - Multiple micronutrient
Selected maternal characteristics at baseline by intervention group
| Variableb | MM | IFA | FA |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at randomization, y | 26.1 ± 4.6 | 25.9 ± 4.2 | 25.8 ± 4.2 | 0.49 |
| Age at first married, y | 21.7 ± 3.2 | 21.8 ± 3.3 | 21.9 ± 3.3 | 0.70 |
| Ethnic minority, % | 52.8 | 48.9 | 48.4 | 0.29 |
| Education Level, % | ||||
| Primary school | 9.5 | 7.2 | 7.5 | 0.34 |
| Secondary school | 52.7 | 53.0 | 55.4 | |
| High school | 27.4 | 26.6 | 23.4 | |
| College or higher | 10.4 | 13.1 | 13.6 | |
| Work as farmers, % | 82.0 | 78.1 | 78.0 | 0.18 |
| SES index | −0.01 ± 0.93 | 0.06 ± 0.95 | 0.06 ± 0.95 | 0.48 |
| Number of children, % | ||||
| 0 | 5.1 | 5.9 | 5.5 | 0.84 |
| 1 | 93.3 | 92.7 | 93.7 | |
| ≥ 2 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 0.8 | |
| Anthropometric measurements | ||||
| Height, cm | 152.7 ± 4.9 | 152.6 ± 5.0 | 152.8 ± 5.2 | 0.75 |
| Weight, kg | 46.1 ± 5.7 | 45.4 ± 5.1 | 45.8 ± 5.5 | 0.13 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 19.8 ± 2.1 | 19.5 ± 1.9 | 19.6 ± 2.1 | 0.10 |
| Underweight (BMI < 18.5), % | 29.0 | 31.5 | 32.2 | 0.50 |
| Dietary intake /d | ||||
| Total energy, kcal | 2240 ± 775 | 2249 ± 754 | 2183 ± 711 | 0.29 |
| Iron, mg | 17.3 ± 8.1 | 17.7 ± 7.5 | 17.0 ± 8.1 | 0.35 |
| Zinc, mg | 10.6 ± 3.6 | 10.6 ± 3.5 | 10.3 ± 3.6 | 0.19 |
| Vitamin C, mg | 235 ± 158 | 244 ± 145 | 245 ± 199 | 0.53 |
| Folate, μg | 344 ± 210 | 355 ± 190 | 343 ± 193 | 0.53 |
| Vitamin B12, μg | 2.1 ± 2.3 | 2.0 ± 1.7 | 1.9 ± 1.8 | 0.18 |
| Vitamin A, μg | 440.2 ± 496.9 | 424.3 ± 360.1 | 414.8 ± 379.8 | 0.60 |
| Hematological indicators | ||||
| Hemoglobin, g/dL | 12.9 ± 1.4 | 12.9 ± 1.4 | 13.0 ± 1.3 | 0.19 |
| Anemia (Hb <12 g/dL), % | 21.6 | 20.1 | 17.9 | 0.31 |
| Ferritin, μg/L (geometric mean)d | 66.31 | 64.07 | 66.89 | 0.74 |
| Insufficient iron stores (ferritin <30 μg/L), % | 13.5 | 14.6 | 11.1 | 0.20 |
| Compliance to preconception supplementse | 95.5 ± 9.7 | 96.1 ± 8.7 | 95.7 ± 9.4 | 0.19 |
| Compliance for prenatal supplementse | 97.1 ± 9.1 | 97.7 ± 6.9 | 97.7 ± 7.1 | 0.27 |
aSample sizes for each variable vary slightly due to item-specific missing data
bValues are mean ± SD or percentages unless otherwise noted
cANOVA test for comparison of means and goodness of fit test for comparison of proportions
dFerritin values were adjusted for inflammation indicators
eCompliance was calculated as the percentage of number of supplements consumed over the total number of supplements delivered
AGP alpha-1-acid glycoprotein, CRP C- reactive protein. BMI Body Mass Index, FA Folic acid, IFA Iron and folic acid, MM Multiple micronutrient, SES Social Economic Status, RBP Retinol Binding Protein
Mean depression scores and proportion of women at risk of elevated depressive symptoms from preconception to postpartum by intervention group
| Variableb | MM | IFA | FA |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean depression score | ||||
| Preconception CESD | 3.42 ± 4.58 | 3.33 ± 4.13 | 3.66 ± 5.30 | 0.48 |
| Prenatal EPDS (first trimester) | 1.43 ± 2.57 | 1.32 ± 2.43 | 1.62 ± 3.03 | 0.15 |
| Prenatal EPDS (second trimester) | 1.03 ± 2.30 | 1.15 ± 2.38 | 1.18 ± 2.46 | 0.69 |
| Prenatal EPDS (third trimester) | 0.71 ± 1.94 | 0.61 ± 1.85 | 0.87 ± 2.16 | 0.20 |
| Postpartum EPDS (3 mo) | 0.65 ± 1.91 | 0.56 ± 1.57 | 0.59 ± 1.98 | 0.72 |
| Proportion who reported elevated MDS during pregnancy | ||||
| Prenatal (first trimester) | 11.00 | 9.32 | 13.29 | 0.11 |
| Prenatal (second trimester) | 7.42 | 8.94 | 8.04 | 0.68 |
| Prenatal (third trimester) | 6.08 | 3.11 | 5.29 | 0.16 |
| Postpartum (3 mo) | 4.45 | 3.32 | 0.31 | 0.49 |
aSample sizes for each variable vary slightly due to item-specific missing data.
bValues are mean ± SD or percentages unless otherwise noted
cANOVA test for comparison of means and goodness of fit test for comparison of proportions
CESD Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, EPDS Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, FA Folic acid, IFA Iron and folic acid, MDS Maternal depressive symptoms, MM Multiple micronutrient
Fig. 2Mean EPDS score during pregnancy and postpartum, by treatment group and baseline level of depressive symptoms1,2.a Low tertile CESD score (n = 725), (b) Middle tertile CESD score (n = 468), (c) High tertile CESD score (n = 423). 1 P = 0.001 and 0.047 for interaction between treatment group and high tertile level of depressive symptoms for mean EPDS score at first and second trimester, respectively 2. Baseline CESD score: low tertile: score 0–1, middle tertile: score 2–4. High tertile: score 5–46.CESD Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, EPDS Edinburgh Postnatal Depression