| Literature DB >> 28623336 |
Muntasir Rahman1, Md Mahbubur Rahman2, Suzan Chandra Deb1,3, Md Shahanoor Alam4, Md Jahangir Alam5, Md Tofazzal Islam6.
Abstract
The opportunistic fish pathogen, Enterococcus faecalis has been reported to cause mass mortality in several fish species in different countries. The objectives of this study were to (i) identify E. faecalis from the diseased fishes through molecular techniques; (ii) assess the antibiotic susceptibility profile of E. faecalis isolates; and (iii) control disease in tilapia fish by treatment with medicinal plant extracts. A total of 48 isolates were phenotypically identified as Enterococcus species from tilapia, stinging catfish and walking catfish cultivated in several fish farms in Gazipur. Ten randomly selected isolates were identified as E. faecalis by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Artificial infection revealed that most of the isolates caused moderate to high mortality in fishes with characteristic disease symptoms. These isolates exhibited resistance to multiple antibiotics in vitro. Bioassay revealed that organic extracts of Tamarindus indica and Emblica officinalis leaves, Allium sativum bulb, and Syzygium aromaticum bud inhibited the growth of E. faecalis. Methanol extracts of A. sativum and methanol and acetone extracts of S. aromaticum significantly reduced the mortality of fish artificially infected with E. faecalis as both preventive and therapeutic agents. This is the first report on molecular identification, and herbal control of fish pathogenic E. faecalis in Bangladesh.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28623336 PMCID: PMC5473830 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03673-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Morphological, physiological and biochemical characters of 48 E. faecalis isolates collected from infected fishes in Bangladesh.
| Test Type | Tests | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Colony characters | Size | M |
| Type | R | |
| Color | Dark red | |
| Shape | C | |
| Morphological character | Shape | Cocci |
| Physiological characters | Motility | − |
| Growth at 10 °C | + | |
| Growth at 45 °C | + | |
| Growth in 40% bile salt | + | |
| Growth in 0.1% methylene blue milk at pH 9.6 | + | |
| Growth in 6.5% NaCl | + | |
| Biochemical characters | Gram’s staining | + |
| Catalase | − | |
| Oxidase | − | |
| Oxidative-Fermentative | F | |
| Methyl Red | + | |
| Voges-Proskauer | + | |
| Indole | + |
M: medium; R: round; C = convex; F: Fermentative; +: positive; − : negative.
Figure 1PCR amplification of E. faecalis isolates with specific forward (Efac F1) and universal reverse (1492R) primer. Ladder, 1 kb plus DNA ladder.
Figure 2Artificially infected fish with E. faecalis isolate expressing distinct disease symptoms. (a) Control; (b) Swollen abdomen and hemorrhages at the base of pelvic fins; (c) Bilateral opacity and sign of asphyxiation; (d) Erosion in caudal fin.
Figure 3Mortality of tilapia fish (Oreochromis niloticus) exposed to fish pathogenic E. faecalis isolates in the laboratory conditions. One way ANOVA was performed for analyzing the data of three replicated experiment and data in column varies significantly in LSD at p ≤ 0.05. Different letter bars indicates significant variations in mortality of fish in different groups by the E. faecalis isolates at p ≤ 0.05.
Antibiotic susceptibility profile of fish pathogenic E. faecalis isolates from infected fishes in Bangladesh.
| Inhibition zone ratio for tested antibiotics | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isolates | Amoxycillin (AMX) | Ampicillin (AMP) | Azithromycin (AZM) | Cefradine (CH) | Cefuroxime (CXM) | Erythromycin (E) | Gentamicin (GEN) | Levofloxacin (LE) | Nitrofurantoin (NIT) | Penicillin-G (P) | Vancomycin (VA) |
| F1B1 | R | R | 2.3 ± 0.0 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | R | R | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 3.4 ± 0.0 | 3.1 ± 0.1 | R | 2.2 ± 0.1 |
| F1B3 | R | R | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | R | R | 3.3 ± 0.0 | 3.4 ± 0.1 | 3.1 ± 0.0 | R | 2.1 ± 0.0 |
| F2B1 | R | R | 2.5 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | R | R | 3.2 ± 0.0 | 3.5 ± 0.0 | 3.1 ± 0.1 | R | 2.3 ± 0.1 |
| F2S1 | R | R | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | R | R | 3.1 ± 0.0 | 3.5 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.1 | R | 2.2 ± 0.1 |
| F3S2 | R | R | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | R | R | 3.4 ± 0.1 | 3.4 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.1 | R | 2.1 ± 0.0 |
| F3B2 | R | R | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.0 | R | R | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.1 | 3.0 ± 0.0 | R | 2.2 ± 0.1 |
| F4S2 | R | R | 2.3 ± 0.0 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | R | R | 3.2 ± 0.0 | 3.2 ± 0.1 | 3.1 ± 0.0 | R | 2.2 ± 0.1 |
| F4E2 | R | R | 2.0 ± 0.0 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | R | R | 3.1 ± 0.1 | 3.5 ± 0.0 | 3.0 ± 0.0 | R | 2.1 ± 0.0 |
| FF11 | R | R | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | R | R | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 3.5 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.0 | R | 2.3 ± 0.0 |
| FF12 | R | R | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.0 | R | R | 3.2 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.0 | 3.2 ± 0.1 | R | 2.4 ± 0.0 |
Erythromycin (15 µg disk−1), Penicillin (10 µg disk−1), Amoxycillin (30 µg disk−1), Vancomycin (30 µg disk−1), Ampicillin (25 µg disk−1), Levofloxacin (5 µg disk−1), Cefuroxime (30 µg disk−1), Azithromycin (30 µg disk−1), Nitrofurantoin (30 µg disk−1), Cefradine (25 µg disk−1), Gentamicin (10 µg disk−1), R = Resistant. Disk diameter is 6.0 mm. Data are presented as Mean ± SE (n = 3).
Figure 4Antibiotic susceptibility profile of fish pathogenic E. faecalis FF11 against commercially available antibiotics.
In vitro inhibitory activities of disk containing aqueous extracts of medicinal plants of Bangladesh against fish pathogenic E. faecalis isolates.
| Name of plant species | Type of inhibition | Inhibition zone ratio for tested aqueous extracts of medicinal plant | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1B1 | F1B3 | F2B1 | F2S1 | F3S2 | F3B2 | F4S2 | F4E2 | FF11 | FF12 | Avg. zone | ||
|
| Bacteriostatic | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.0 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.02 |
|
| Bacteriostatic | 1.2 ± 0.0 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.0 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.6 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.03 |
|
| Bacteriostatic | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 3.1 ± 0.3 | 2.9 ± 0.3 | 2.7 ± 0.0 | 2.9 ± 0.3 | 2.8 ± 0.1 | 3.0 ± 0.1 | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 2.9 ± 0.04 |
|
| Bactericidal | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.0 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.04 |
8 mm filter paper disc soaked with aqueous extracts of T. indica, E. officinalis, A. sativum and S. aromaticum (30 µl disk−1) were used. Data are presented as Mean ± SE (n = 3).
In vitro inhibitory activities of disk containing different organic extracts of Syzygium aromaticum and Allium sativum against fish pathogenic E. faecalis isolates.
| Treatment | Inhibition zone ratio for tested organic extracts of medicinal plants | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Extract | F1B1 | F1B3 | F2B1 | F2S1 | F3B2 | F3S2 | F4E2 | FF11 | FF12 | Avg. zone | |
|
| Methanol extract* | 2.1 ± 0.0 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.0 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.0 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 2.0 ± 0.05 |
|
| Methanol extract* | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.0 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.0 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.04 |
| Acetone extract* | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.0 | 2.1 ± 0.0 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.03 | |
|
| 1.4 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.0 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.0 | 1.4 ± 0.0 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.03 | |
8 mm filter paper disk soaked with methanol extract of A. sativum, methanol extract of S. aromaticum, acetone extract of S. aromaticum and n-hexane extract of S. aromaticum (30 µl disk−1) were used. Data are presented as Mean ± SE (n = 3).
Figure 5In vitro antibacterial activity of disk containing solvent extract of Allium sativum and Syzygium aromaticum. Note: (i) methanol extract of S. aromaticum, (ii) acetone extract of S. aromaticum, (iii) Acetone extract of A. sativum, (iv) Blank control, (v) Azithromycin antibiotic disk.
Relative percentage of survival (RPS) of fish fed with medicinal plant extracts as preventive agents in artificial infection challenge with fish pathogenic E. faecalis.
| Treatment | RPS (%) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High Virulent Strains | Moderate Virulent Strains | Low Virulent Strains | ||||||||||
| F1B1 | F2B1 | FF11 | F2S1 | F3S2 | Avg. RPS | F1B3 | F4E2 | Avg. RPS | F3B2 | FF12 | Avg. RPS | |
|
| 80 | 70 | 70 | 75 | 75 | 74 | 67 | 75 | 71 | 100 | 50 | 75 |
|
| 60 | 80 | 80 | 100 | 50 | 74 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 100 | 50 | 75 |
|
| 40 | 60 | 80 | 100 | 75 | 71 | 67 | 67 | 67 | 75 | 75 | 75 |
|
| 60 | 60 | 80 | 50 | 50 | 65 | 50 | 67 | 58 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Figure 6Average survival rate (therapeutic effects) of O. niloticus fed with medicinal plant extracts and commercial antibiotics after infection challenge by a high virulent strain of E. faecalis. One way ANOVA was performed for analysis of the data and mean values in the bars followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different as assessed by LSD (least significance difference) at p ≤ 0.05.
Sequences, size and GC contents of primers used for PCR amplification.
| Primers | Sequence (5′-3′) | Nucleotide numbers in | Primer size (bp) | GC content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EfacF1 | CGTTAGTAACTGAACGTC | 470–488 | 18 | 44.44 |
| Efac R1 | GACCGCGAGGTCATGCA | 1353–1370 | 17 | 64.7 |
| Universal 1492R | GGATACCTTGTTACGACTT | 1473–1492 | 19 | 42.1 |