Literature DB >> 28623074

Geographic variability in gestational weight gain: a multilevel population-based study of women having term births in Florida (2005-2012).

Maya Tabet1, Erik Nelson2, Mario Schootman3, Lung-Chang Chien4, Jen Jen Chang3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We examined the extent of geographic variability in gestational weight gain (GWG), identified areas where women have suboptimal GWG, and evaluated whether individual- and area-level factors account for such variability.
METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study including 1,385,574 women delivering term, singleton, and live births in Florida. We used a Bayesian, structured additive regression with a spatial function to analyze data from Florida's birth certificates (2005-2012) and ZIP code tabulation areas (ZCTAs; 2010 Census).
RESULTS: The prevalence of insufficient (7.7%-42.9%) and excessive (17.1%-82.4%) GWG varied widely within Florida. Geographic variability was not explained by risk factors under study. Clusters in Orlando, Tampa, and Miami exhibited increased likelihood of insufficient GWG, whereas clusters in the Northwest of Florida exhibited increased likelihood of excessive GWG.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified areas in Florida with high likelihood of suboptimal GWG that policy-makers should prioritize in the implementation of programs for optimizing GWG.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Excessive gestational weight gain; Geographic variability; Insufficient gestational weight gain

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28623074     DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  3 in total

1.  Lack of concern about body image and health during pregnancy linked to excessive gestational weight gain and small-for-gestational-age deliveries: the Japan Environment and Children's Study.

Authors:  Naw Awn J-P; Marina Minami; Masamitsu Eitoku; Nagamasa Maeda; Mikiya Fujieda; Narufumi Suganuma
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Knowledge, attitude, and practice of the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations on the nutritional management of diabetes in pregnancy: an online national survey.

Authors:  Gloria Formoso; Cristina Bianchi; Silvia Burlina; Elisa Manicardi; Maria Angela Sculli; Veronica Resi; Laura Sciacca
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.087

3.  Monitoring gestational weight gain and prepregnancy BMI using the 2009 IOM guidelines in the global population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jose Alberto Martínez-Hortelano; Iván Cavero-Redondo; Celia Álvarez-Bueno; Miriam Garrido-Miguel; Alba Soriano-Cano; Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.