Literature DB >> 28622950

Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia with insulin glargine 300U/mL versus insulin glargine 100U/mL in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes: 12-month results from the EDITION 3 trial.

G B Bolli1, M C Riddle2, R M Bergenstal3, M Wardecki4, H Goyeau5, P D Home6.   

Abstract

AIM: To explore if efficacy and safety findings for insulin glargine 300U/mL (Gla-300) versus insulin glargine 100U/mL (Gla-100), observed over 6 months in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes, are maintained after 12 months.
METHODS: EDITION 3 was a phase 3a, randomized, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, treat-to-target study of once-daily Gla-300 versus Gla-100 (target fasting self-monitored plasma glucose, 4.4-5.6mmol/L [80-100mg/dL]). Participants completing the initial 6-month treatment phase continued their previously allocated basal insulin.
RESULTS: Of 878 participants randomized, 337/439 (77%) and 314/439 (72%) assigned to Gla-300 and Gla-100, respectively, completed 12 months of treatment. Improved glycaemic control was sustained until 12 months in both treatment groups, with similar reductions in HbA1c from baseline to month 12 (difference: -0.08 [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.23 to 0.07] % or -0.9 [-2.5 to 0.8] mmol/mol). Relative risk of experiencing≥1 confirmed (≤3.9mmol/L [≤70mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycaemic event with Gla-300 versus Gla-100 was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.69 to 1.07) at night and 0.92 (0.82 to 1.03) at any time of day. For events with a glycaemic threshold of<3.0mmol/L (<54mg/dL) these numbers were 0.76 (0.49 to 1.19) and 0.66 (0.50 to 0.88). A similar pattern was seen for documented symptomatic events. No between-group differences in adverse events were identified.
CONCLUSION: Over 12 months, Gla-300 treatment was as effective as Gla-100 in reducing HbA1c in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes, with lower overall risk of hypoglycaemia at the<3.0mmol/L threshold.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Basal insulin analogues; Insulin-naïve patients; Type 2 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28622950     DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2017.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab        ISSN: 1262-3636            Impact factor:   6.041


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Insulin therapy-new insulin analogues].

Authors:  M Ehren; H H Klein
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL versus 100 U/mL in Diabetes Mellitus: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Hernando Vargas-Uricoechea
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.011

3.  Real-World Use of Insulin Glargine U100 and U300 in Insulin-Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: DosInGlar Study.

Authors:  Natalia Duque; Esther Artime; Irene Romera; Jeremie Lebrec; Silvia Díaz; Miriam Rubio; Antoni Sicras-Mainar; Enrique Carretero-Anibarro; Xavier Mundet; Juan J Gorgojo-Martínez; Jesús Reviriego
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Efficacy and safety of switching to insulin glargine 300 U/mL from 100 U/mL in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A 12-month retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Kazutoshi Sugiyama; Shu Meguro; Yoshifumi Saisho; Junichiro Irie; Masami Tanaka; Hiroshi Itoh
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-02-21

Review 5.  Basal insulin therapy: Unmet medical needs in Asia and the new insulin glargine in diabetes treatment.

Authors:  Kai-Jen Tien; Yi-Jen Hung; Jung-Fu Chen; Ching-Chu Chen; Chih-Yuan Wang; Chii-Min Hwu; Yu-Yao Huang; Pi-Jung Hsiao; Shih-Te Tu; Chao-Hung Wang; Wayne Huey-Herng Sheu
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.232

Review 6.  Reporting of hypoglycaemia in clinical trials of basal insulins: A need for consensus.

Authors:  Brian M Frier; Alexandria Ratzki-Leewing; Stewart B Harris
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 6.577

7.  Achievement of Target A1C <7.0% (<53 mmol/mol) by U.S. Type 2 Diabetes Patients Treated With Basal Insulin in Both Randomized Controlled Trials and Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Lawrence Blonde; Stephen A Brunton; Pavan Chava; Rong Zhou; Juliana Meyers; Keith L Davis; Mehul R Dalal; Andres DiGenio
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2019-05

8.  Low Blood Glucose Index and Hypoglycaemia Risk: Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL Versus Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL in Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Boris Kovatchev; Zhaoling Meng; Anna M G Cali; Riccardo Perfetti; Marc D Breton
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.945

9.  Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus insulin glargine 100 U/mL in Asia Pacific insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes: The EDITION AP randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Linong Ji; Eun Seok Kang; XiaoLin Dong; Ling Li; GuoYue Yuan; Shuhua Shang; Elisabeth Niemoeller
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 6.577

10.  A comparison of the clinical courses of type 2 diabetic patients whose basal insulin preparation was replaced from insulin glargine 100 units/mL to insulin glargine biosimilar or 300 units/mL: a propensity score-matched observation study.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Ito; Emiko Tsugami; Shigenori Ando; Rie Araki; Suzuko Matsumoto; Kosuke Uemura; Shinya Nishio; Shinichi Antoku; Tomoko Yamasaki; Toshiko Mori; Michiko Togane
Journal:  J Drug Assess       Date:  2018-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.