| Literature DB >> 28622850 |
Tanja Krimmling1, Andreas Beineke2, Christel Schwegmann-Weßels3.
Abstract
TGEV is a coronavirus that is still widely spread in pig farming. On molecular level this virus has been studied in detail. However, studying TGEV infection within the complexity of the porcine intestinal epithelium reveals difficulties due to limiting infection models. Here we established a new ex vivo model to analyze the enterotropism of TGEV in porcine intestinal tissue. Precision cut intestinal slices (PCIS) were produced and ATP level was measured to proof vitality of the slices. ATP measurements and HE staining revealed living tissue in culture for up to 24h. PCIS were infected with three different TGEV strains. TGEV PUR 46-MAD is a commonly used TGEV strain that is known to be attenuated. TGEV Miller was passaged in piglets several times to reveal high infection. Finally, TGEV GFP is a recombinant strain that obtained its main body from TGEV PUR 46-MAD, but its spike protein from TGEV PUR-C11 that showed high mortality in piglets in vivo. Our results were in complete consensus of these statements. TGEV Miller mildly and TGEV GFP extensively infected the cells in the jejunum based on the amount of positive stained epithelial cells. However, for TGEV PUR 46-MAD no nucleocapsid protein was detected in the epithelial cells of the tissue. This shows that differences in TGEV strains and their infectious potential are highly dependent on their S protein.Entities:
Keywords: Coronavirus; Porcine gastroenteritis; Porcine jejunum; Precision cut intestinal slices; Spike protein; TGEV
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28622850 PMCID: PMC7117111 DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.04.029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Microbiol ISSN: 0378-1135 Impact factor: 3.293
Fig. 1PCIS production. Jejunal tissue was surrounded with agarose in syringes (A) to produce solid agarose tubes (B). Tubes were cut in Krumdiek fitted sizes (C) and PCIS were collected (D).
Numbers of swine analyzed by HE staining, ATP measurement, and TGEV infection per indicated time points.
| Time post infection | HE | ATP | TGEV PUR 46-MAD | TGEV GFP | TGEV Miller | Mock |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 h | 2 | 5 | ||||
| 3 h | Not tested | 5 | ||||
| 6 h | 2 | Not tested | 4 | 2 | Not tested | 4 |
| 9 h | 2 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 12 h | 6 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 5 | |
| 16 h | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| 24 h | 2 | Not tested | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
| 6 h | − | − | Not tested | − | ||
| 9 h | − | + | − | − | ||
| 12 h | − | + | + | − | ||
| 16 h | − | + | + | − | ||
| 24 h | Not tested | + | + | − | ||
Fig. 2PCIS staining. HE staining of uninfected control (A) and TGEV PUR-MAD infected PCIS 6 h p.i. (B). Black bar = 200 μm. Immunhistochemical staining of TGEV N proteins (brown): TGEV PUR46-MAD infection of PCIS shown at 12 h p.i. (C) and 16 h p.i. (D). Uninfected MOCK controls shown on the right (E, F). TGEV GFP infection of PCIS shown at 9 h p.i. (G), 12 h p.i. (H), 16 h p.i. (I) and 24 h p.i. (J). Uninfected MOCK controls shown on the right (K, L, M, N). TGEV Miller infection of PCIS shown at 9 h p.i. (O), 12 h p.i. (P), 16 h p.i. (Q) and 24 h p.i. (R). Uninfected MOCK controls shown on the right (S, T, U, V). Black bar = 100 μm.
Fig. 3Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) measurement of PCIS in μM after production (timepoint 0) and after 3 h, 9 h, 12 h, 16 h and 24 h in culture. PCIS compared for differences to time point 0. Unpaired t-test; **p = 0,0014; ***p = 0,0006; n = 24 PCIS.