Literature DB >> 28622117

Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in the Emergency Department: What the Orthopedic Surgeon Wants to Know.

Richard A Marshall1, Michael J Weaver1, Aaron Sodickson1, Bharti Khurana1.   

Abstract

Femoral fracture in the setting of a hip arthroplasty is an increasingly common complication encountered in the emergency department (ED). Diagnosis and management of periprosthetic fractures are complicated, and orthopedic surgeons rely on imaging findings to guide the appropriate management approach to the injury. Delay in identification and appropriate definitive management of periprosthetic fractures is associated with high morbidity and mortality. At present, the Vancouver classification system for periprosthetic hip fractures is the most common classification system used by orthopedic surgeons. It relies on three radiographic criteria-fracture location, prosthesis stability, and quality of the femoral bone stock-to characterize these fractures and to help guide management decisions. Familiarly with the Vancouver classification system allows radiologists to both recognize and communicate the most clinically relevant imaging findings to the treating orthopedic surgeon. This article reviews the imaging workup for hip pain in patients with a femoral prosthesis, risk factors for periprosthetic fracture, and the expected normal appearance of the most commonly encountered types of femoral prostheses. Fracture terminology and the Vancouver classification system are reviewed in a simplified algorithm with emphasis on the most common patterns of periprosthetic fractures, the radiologic determinants of prosthesis stability and bone quality, and the management implications of these imaging findings. Finally, multiple instructive clinical cases are used to demonstrate critical application of the classification system and to highlight the clinical implications of the imaging findings. ©RSNA, 2017.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28622117     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2017160127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  5 in total

1.  Highlights from the scientific and educational abstracts presented at the ASER 2015 annual scientific meeting and postgraduate course.

Authors:  Lee A Myers; Keith D Herr
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-02-16

2.  Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a comparative study of stem revision versus internal fixation with plate.

Authors:  Mauro Spina; Andrea Scalvi
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-03-21

Review 3.  Dual energy CT in musculoskeletal applications beyond crystal imaging: bone marrow maps and metal artifact reduction.

Authors:  Gaurav Cheraya; Salil Sharma; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Automatic detection and classification of peri-prosthetic femur fracture.

Authors:  Asma Alzaid; Alice Wignall; Sanja Dogramadzi; Hemant Pandit; Sheng Quan Xie
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  The race for the classification of proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures : Vancouver vs Unified Classification System (UCS) - a systematic review.

Authors:  Clemens Schopper; Matthias Luger; Günter Hipmair; Bernhard Schauer; Tobias Gotterbarm; Antonio Klasan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.