Literature DB >> 28620996

Feasibility of Collecting Patient-Reported Outcomes for Inpatient Rehabilitation Quality Reporting.

Allen Walter Heinemann1,2, Anne Deutsch1,2, David Cella3, Karon Frances Cook3, Linda Foster4, Ana Miskovic1, Katharine Davis1, Arielle Goldsmith1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate rehabilitation inpatients' willingness and ability to complete patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and the burden of completion on patients and staff. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Two inpatient rehabilitation facilities. STUDY
DESIGN: Patients with neurological disorders were assigned randomly to receive a nominal monetary incentive during or 1 month after the stay. DATA COLLECTION: Patients responded using a tablet computer or paper. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Of the 1,055 admissions, 74 percent were eligible, and 51 percent of eligible patients completed the survey. Most answered without assistance. A majority completed the survey 1 month after discharge; incentive timing was unrelated to postdischarge completion. Half of the 285 follow-up respondents required at least two reminder calls.
CONCLUSIONS: Collection of PROs from rehabilitation patients is feasible. Results inform policy makers regarding feasibility of PRO data in evaluating rehabilitation quality. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Quality of care/patient safety (measurement); disability; patient assessment/satisfaction; quality improvement/report cards (interventions); rehabilitation services

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28620996      PMCID: PMC5980389          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  10 in total

1.  The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McGlynn; Steven M Asch; John Adams; Joan Keesey; Jennifer Hicks; Alison DeCristofaro; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The neurology quality-of-life measurement initiative.

Authors:  David Cella; Cindy Nowinski; Amy Peterman; David Victorson; Deborah Miller; Jin-Shei Lai; Claudia Moy
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Making the investment count: revision of the Minimum Data Set for nursing homes, MDS 3.0.

Authors:  Debra Saliba; Joan Buchanan
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 4.669

4.  Assessing the quality of preparation for posthospital care from the patient's perspective: the care transitions measure.

Authors:  Eric A Coleman; Eldon Mahoney; Carla Parry
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 5.  Prediction of rehabilitation outcomes with disability measures.

Authors:  A W Heinemann; J M Linacre; B D Wright; B B Hamilton; C Granger
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; Thérèse A Stukel; Daniel J Gottlieb; F L Lucas; Etoile L Pinder
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference.

Authors:  Dagmar Amtmann; Karon F Cook; Mark P Jensen; Wen-Hung Chen; Seung Choi; Dennis Revicki; David Cella; Nan Rothrock; Francis Keefe; Leigh Callahan; Jin-Shei Lai
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Modifications of the FIM instrument under the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system.

Authors:  Carl V Granger; Anne Deutsch; Carol Russell; Terrie Black; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.159

9.  Screening for organic mental syndromes in the medically ill.

Authors:  J W Jacobs; M R Bernhard; A Delgado; J J Strain
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Neuro-QOL: brief measures of health-related quality of life for clinical research in neurology.

Authors:  D Cella; J-S Lai; C J Nowinski; D Victorson; A Peterman; D Miller; F Bethoux; A Heinemann; S Rubin; J E Cavazos; A T Reder; R Sufit; T Simuni; G L Holmes; A Siderowf; V Wojna; R Bode; N McKinney; T Podrabsky; K Wortman; S Choi; R Gershon; N Rothrock; C Moy
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 9.910

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  How to implement routine electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring in oncology rehabilitation.

Authors:  Lisa M Wintner; Monika Sztankay; David Riedl; Gerhard Rumpold; Alain Nickels; Thomas Licht; Bernhard Holzner
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.503

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.