Vincenzo Consalvo1, Vincenzo Salsano2,3, Gerardo Sarno4, Iphigenie Chaze3,5. 1. Università degli Studi di Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, Fisciano, SA, Italy. vincenzoconsa@gmail.com. 2. Clinique Clementville Montpellier, 25 Rue de Clementville, Montpellier, France. 3. Clinique du Parc Montpellier, 50 Rue Emile Combes, Montpellier, France. 4. Azienda ospedaliero universitaria san Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Via San Leonardo, Salerno, Italy. 5. Department of Gastroenterology, Clinique Clementville Montpellier, 25 Rue de Clementville, Montpellier, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE:Bariatric surgery is a treatment for morbid obesity. Different surgical procedures have been described in order to obtain excess weight loss (EWL), but currently laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is the most commonly performed procedure throughout the world. Reducing abdominal wall trauma and increasing the aesthetic result are important goals for all bariatric surgeons. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial in order to assess if the three-trocar sleeve gastrectomy can be safely carried out or should be abandoned. MATERIALS AND METHODS:From September 2016 to February 2017, 90 patients were enrolled in our trial. Each patients was evaluated by a multidisciplinary team before surgery. Two groups were created after application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was to define the features of early post-operative complications of patients in group 1 (the three-trocar technique-the experimental group) compared to group 2 (five-trocar technique-the control group). The secondary endpoints were to evaluate any differences between the two groups concerning post-operative pain and patients' satisfaction with the aesthetic results. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups concerning age, sex distribution, weight, and BMI. The rate of co-morbidities was similar in both groups. Operative time was inferior in the control group, but patient satisfaction was better in the three-trocar sleeve gastrectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: The three-trocar sleeve gastrectomy can be safely carried out with a modest increase in operative time, without additional early surgical complications and with a greater patient aesthetic satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: researchregistry2386.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Bariatric surgery is a treatment for morbid obesity. Different surgical procedures have been described in order to obtain excess weight loss (EWL), but currently laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is the most commonly performed procedure throughout the world. Reducing abdominal wall trauma and increasing the aesthetic result are important goals for all bariatric surgeons. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial in order to assess if the three-trocar sleeve gastrectomy can be safely carried out or should be abandoned. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2016 to February 2017, 90 patients were enrolled in our trial. Each patients was evaluated by a multidisciplinary team before surgery. Two groups were created after application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was to define the features of early post-operative complications of patients in group 1 (the three-trocar technique-the experimental group) compared to group 2 (five-trocar technique-the control group). The secondary endpoints were to evaluate any differences between the two groups concerning post-operative pain and patients' satisfaction with the aesthetic results. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups concerning age, sex distribution, weight, and BMI. The rate of co-morbidities was similar in both groups. Operative time was inferior in the control group, but patient satisfaction was better in the three-trocar sleeve gastrectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: The three-trocar sleeve gastrectomy can be safely carried out with a modest increase in operative time, without additional early surgical complications and with a greater patient aesthetic satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: researchregistry2386.
Entities:
Keywords:
Complication of sleeve gastrectomy; Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; Reduced port sleeve gastrectomy; Three-port sleeve gastrectomy; Three-trocar sleeve gastrectomy
Authors: Raul J Rosenthal; Alberto Aceves Diaz; Dag Arvidsson; Randal S Baker; Nicola Basso; Drake Bellanger; Camilo Boza; Haicam El Mourad; Michael France; Michel Gagner; Manoel Galvao-Neto; Kelvin D Higa; Jacques Himpens; Colleen M Hutchinson; Moises Jacobs; John O Jorgensen; Gregg Jossart; Muffazal Lakdawala; Ninh T Nguyen; David Nocca; Gerhard Prager; Alfons Pomp; Almino Cardoso Ramos; Raul J Rosenthal; Shashank Shah; Michel Vix; Alan Wittgrove; Natan Zundel Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2011-11-10 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: David E Arterburn; Maren K Olsen; Valerie A Smith; Edward H Livingston; Lynn Van Scoyoc; William S Yancy; George Eid; Hollis Weidenbacher; Matthew L Maciejewski Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Attila Csendes; Patricio Burdiles; Ana Maria Burgos; Fernando Maluenda; Juan Carlos Diaz Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Ricard Corcelles; Mena Boules; Dvir Froylich; Christopher Ryan Daigle; Amani Hag; Phillip R Schauer; Tomasz Rogula Journal: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 1.878
Authors: An-Wen Chan; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman; Andreas Laupacis; Peter C Gøtzsche; Karmela Krleža-Jerić; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Howard Mann; Kay Dickersin; Jesse A Berlin; Caroline J Doré; Wendy R Parulekar; William S M Summerskill; Trish Groves; Kenneth F Schulz; Harold C Sox; Frank W Rockhold; Drummond Rennie; David Moher Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Helen P Booth; Omar Khan; Alison Fildes; A Toby Prevost; Marcus Reddy; Judith Charlton; Martin C Gulliford Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Sébastien Czernichow; Michel Paita; David Nocca; Simon Msika; Arnaud Basdevant; Bertrand Millat; Anne Fagot-Campagna Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 1.817