Kieran L Quinn1,2, Erin M Macdonald3, Muhammad M Mamdani4,3,5,6,7, Christina Diong3, David N Juurlink3,5,6,8,9. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. kieran.quinn@mail.utoronto.ca. 2. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue G106, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada. kieran.quinn@mail.utoronto.ca. 3. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 5. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 6. Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. 7. King Saudi University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 8. Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada. 9. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue G106, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Statins are commonly prescribed for the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke, but there is conflicting evidence as to whether they increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Lipophilic statins cross the blood-brain barrier more freely than hydrophilic statins and may therefore increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether, in older patients following ischemic stroke, receipt of lipophilic statins was associated with differences in the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. METHODS: We conducted a population-based nested case-control study linking multiple healthcare databases between 1 April, 2001 and 31 March, 2015 in Ontario, Canada. Cases were Ontarians aged 66 years or older receiving a statin within 100 days preceding the development of intracranial hemorrhage within 1 year following ischemic stroke. Each case was matched with up to four controls who experienced ischemic stroke not complicated by intracranial hemorrhage but who also received a statin. We classified statins as lipophilic (atorvastatin, simvastatin, lovastatin, fluvastatin, and cerivastatin) or hydrophilic (pravastatin and rosuvastatin) based on their octanol/water partition coefficients. We calculated the odds ratio for the association between intracranial hemorrhage and receipt of lipophilic statins, with hydrophilic statins as the reference group. RESULTS: We identified 2766 individuals who experienced intracranial hemorrhage during statin therapy after ischemic stroke and 11,060 matched controls. Relative to hydrophilic statins, lipophilic statins were not associated with an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio 1.07; 95% confidence interval 0.97-1.19). CONCLUSION: Among patients treated with a statin following ischemic stroke, the risk of intracranial hemorrhage is not influenced by statin lipophilicity.
BACKGROUND: Statins are commonly prescribed for the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke, but there is conflicting evidence as to whether they increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Lipophilic statins cross the blood-brain barrier more freely than hydrophilic statins and may therefore increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether, in older patients following ischemic stroke, receipt of lipophilic statins was associated with differences in the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. METHODS: We conducted a population-based nested case-control study linking multiple healthcare databases between 1 April, 2001 and 31 March, 2015 in Ontario, Canada. Cases were Ontarians aged 66 years or older receiving a statin within 100 days preceding the development of intracranial hemorrhage within 1 year following ischemic stroke. Each case was matched with up to four controls who experienced ischemic stroke not complicated by intracranial hemorrhage but who also received a statin. We classified statins as lipophilic (atorvastatin, simvastatin, lovastatin, fluvastatin, and cerivastatin) or hydrophilic (pravastatin and rosuvastatin) based on their octanol/water partition coefficients. We calculated the odds ratio for the association between intracranial hemorrhage and receipt of lipophilic statins, with hydrophilic statins as the reference group. RESULTS: We identified 2766 individuals who experienced intracranial hemorrhage during statin therapy after ischemic stroke and 11,060 matched controls. Relative to hydrophilic statins, lipophilic statins were not associated with an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio 1.07; 95% confidence interval 0.97-1.19). CONCLUSION: Among patients treated with a statin following ischemic stroke, the risk of intracranial hemorrhage is not influenced by statin lipophilicity.
Authors: Daniel G Hackam; Mark Woodward; L Kristin Newby; Deepak L Bhatt; Mingyuan Shao; Eric E Smith; Allan Donner; Muhammad Mamdani; James D Douketis; Hisatomi Arima; John Chalmers; Stephen MacMahon; David L Tirschwell; Bruce M Psaty; Cheryl D Bushnell; Maria I Aguilar; Dan J Capampangan; David J Werring; Paola De Rango; Anand Viswanathan; Nicolas Danchin; Ching-Lan Cheng; Yea-Huei Kao Yang; B Marianne Verdel; Mei-Shu Lai; James Kennedy; Shinichiro Uchiyama; Takenori Yamaguchi; Yasuo Ikeda; Marko Mrkobrada Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Pierre Amarenco; Julien Bogousslavsky; Alfred Callahan; Larry B Goldstein; Michael Hennerici; Amy E Rudolph; Henrik Sillesen; Lisa Simunovic; Michael Szarek; K M A Welch; Justin A Zivin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-08-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C Baigent; L Blackwell; J Emberson; L E Holland; C Reith; N Bhala; R Peto; E H Barnes; A Keech; J Simes; R Collins Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Michael Fralick; Erin M Macdonald; Tara Gomes; Tony Antoniou; Simon Hollands; Muhammad M Mamdani; David N Juurlink Journal: BMJ Date: 2014-10-30
Authors: Kieran L Quinn; Michael A Campitelli; Christina Diong; Nick Daneman; Nathan M Stall; Andrew M Morris; Allan S Detsky; Lianne Jeffs; Colleen J Maxwell; Chaim M Bell; Susan E Bronskill Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Antonio Nenna; Francesco Nappi; Mario Lusini; Umberto Maria Satriano; Davide Schilirò; Cristiano Spadaccio; Massimo Chello Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 3.411