Literature DB >> 28620738

Variation in sex pheromone emission does not reflect immunocompetence but affects attractiveness of male burying beetles-a combination of laboratory and field experiments.

Johanna Chemnitz1, Nadiia Bagrii1, Manfred Ayasse1, Sandra Steiger2,3.   

Abstract

Life history theory predicts a trade-off between male sexual trait expression and immunocompetence. Using burying beetles, Nicrophorus vespilloides, as a model, we investigated the relationship between male immune function, sex pheromone emission, and attractiveness under field conditions. In the first experiment, we tested whether there is a positive correlation between immune capacity, sex pheromone characteristics (quantity, relative composition, and time invested in pheromone emission), and male attractiveness. As a measurement of immune capacity, we used an individual's encapsulation ability against a novel antigen. In the second experiment, we specifically examined whether a trade-off between chemical trait expression and immune function existed. To this end, we challenged the immune system and measured the subsequent investment in sex pheromone emission and the attractiveness of the male under field conditions. We found that a male's immunocompetence was neither related to the emission of the male's sex pheromone nor to its attractiveness in the field. Furthermore, none of the immune-challenge treatments affected the subsequent investment in pheromone emission or number of females attracted. However, we showed that the same males that emitted a high quantity of their sex pheromone in the laboratory were able to attract more females in the field. Our data suggest that the chemical signal is not a reliable predictor of a male's immunocompetence but rather is a general important fitness-related trait, with a higher emission of the sex pheromone measured in the laboratory directly affecting the attractiveness of a male under field conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical signal; Ecological immunology; Encapsulation; Immunity; Nicrophorus; Sex pheromone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28620738     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-017-1473-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  38 in total

1.  Male calling song provides a reliable signal of immune function in a cricket.

Authors:  J J Ryder; M T Siva-Jothy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Invertebrate immune systems--not homogeneous, not simple, not well understood.

Authors:  Eric S Loker; Coen M Adema; Si-Ming Zhang; Thomas B Kepler
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.988

3.  Sperm storage induces an immunity cost in ants.

Authors:  Boris Baer; Sophie A O Armitage; Jacobus J Boomsma
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Antimicrobial strategies in burying beetles breeding on carrion.

Authors:  D E Rozen; D J P Engelmoer; P T Smiseth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Biological mediators of insect immunity.

Authors:  J P Gillespie; M R Kanost; T Trenczek
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 19.686

6.  A trade-off between sexual signalling and immune function in a natural population of the drumming wolf spider Hygrolycosa rubrofasciata.

Authors:  J J Ahtiainen; R V Alatalo; R Kortet; M J Rantala
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Immune response is energetically costly in white cabbage butterfly pupae.

Authors:  Dalial Freitak; Indrek Ots; Alo Vanatoa; Peeter Hõrak
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Ethyl 4-methyl heptanoate: a male-produced pheromone of Nicrophorus vespilloides.

Authors:  Wolf Haberer; Thomas Schmitt; Klaus Peschke; Peter Schreier; Josef K Müller
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  The sicker sex.

Authors:  Marlene Zuk
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 6.823

10.  Sex, offspring and carcass determine antimicrobial peptide expression in the burying beetle.

Authors:  Chris G C Jacobs; Sandra Steiger; David G Heckel; Natalie Wielsch; Andreas Vilcinskas; Heiko Vogel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Pheromones Regulating Reproduction in Subsocial Beetles: Insights with References to Eusocial Insects.

Authors:  Sandra Steiger; Johannes Stökl
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Specificity of the female's local cellular immune response in genital plug producing scorpion species.

Authors:  Mariela A Oviedo-Diego; Camilo I Mattoni; Alfredo V Peretti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Experimental immune challenges reduce the quality of male antennae and female pheromone output.

Authors:  Hieu T Pham; Mark A Elgar; Emile van Lieshout; Kathryn B McNamara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The Impact of Environmental Factors on the Efficacy of Chemical Communication in the Burying Beetle (Coleoptera: Silphidae).

Authors:  Johanna Chemnitz; Christian von Hoermann; Manfred Ayasse; Sandra Steiger
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 1.857

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.