Literature DB >> 28619688

Single-port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: seven years of experience at a single institution.

Laura Moulton1, Amelia M Jernigan2, Caitlin Carr3, Lindsey Freeman4, Pedro F Escobar5, Chad M Michener6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-port laparoscopy has gained popularity within minimally invasive gynecologic surgery for its feasibility, cosmetic outcomes, and safety. However, within gynecologic oncology, there are limited data regarding short-term adverse outcomes and long-term hernia risk in patients undergoing single-port laparoscopic surgery.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to describe short-term outcomes and hernia rates in patients after single-port laparoscopy in a gynecologic oncology practice. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective, single-institution study was performed for patients who underwent single-port laparoscopy from 2009 to 2015. A univariate analysis was performed with χ2 tests and Student t tests; Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards determined time to hernia development.
RESULTS: A total of 898 patients underwent 908 surgeries with a median follow-up of 37.2 months. The mean age and body mass index were 55.7 years and 29.6 kg/m2, respectively. The majority were white (87.9%) and American Society of Anesthesiologists class II/III (95.5%). The majority of patients underwent surgery for adnexal masses (36.9%) and endometrial hyperplasia/cancer (37.3%). Most women underwent hysterectomy (62.7%) and removal of 1 or both fallopian tubes and/or ovaries (86%). Rate of adverse outcomes within 30 days, including reoperation (0.1%), intraoperative injury (1.4%), intensive care unit admission (0.4%), venous thromboembolism (0.3%), and blood transfusion, were low (0.8%). The rate of urinary tract infection was 2.8%; higher body mass index (P = .02), longer operative time (P = .02), smoking (P = .01), hysterectomy (P = .01), and cystoscopy (P = .02) increased the risk. The rate of incisional cellulitis was 3.5%. Increased estimated blood loss (P = .03) and endometrial cancer (P = .02) were independent predictors of incisional cellulitis. The rate for surgical readmissions was 3.4%; higher estimated blood loss (P = .03), longer operative time (P = .02), chemotherapy alone (P = .03), and combined chemotherapy and radiation (P < .05) increased risk. The rate of incisional hernia rate was 5.5% (n = 50) with a mean occurrence at 570.2 ± 553.3 days. Higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P = .04), diabetes (P < .001), hypertension (P = .043), increasing age (P = .017; hazard ratio [HR], 1.03), and body mass index (P < .001; HR, 1.08) were independent predictors for incisional hernia development. Previous abdominal surgeries (P = .24) and hand assist (P = .64) were not associated with increased risk for incisional hernia. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists class III/IV had a 3 year hernia rate of 12.8% (HR, 1.81). Patients with diabetes mellitus had a 3 year hernia rate of 23.0% (HR, 3.60).
CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of patients undergoing single-port laparoscopy, the incidence of short-term adverse outcomes is low. While the rate of incisional hernia was 5.5%, incidence reached 23.0% at 3 years in high-risk groups. Previous studies with short follow-up duration may underestimate the risk of hernia, especially in patients with significant comorbidities.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse outcomes; gynecologic oncology; incisional hernia; laparoendoscopic single-site surgery; minimally invasive surgery; single-incision laparoscopy; single-port laparoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28619688     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

1.  Therapeutic effect of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery versus triple-port laparoscopic surgery for ovarian cyst.

Authors:  Yihai Zhang; Li Shi; Chunfu Li; Bing Zhang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Laparoscopic vs percutaneous hysterectomy in obese patients: a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  E Perrone; F Fanfani; C Rossitto; S Cianci; A Fagotti; S Restaino; C Fedele; G Scambia; S Gueli Alletti
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2020-03-27

3.  Trocar-site hernia after gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a 20-year, single-center experience.

Authors:  Ya-Pei Zhu; Shuo Liang; Lan Zhu; Zhi-Jing Sun; Jing-He Lang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  Incisional hernia after 2498 single-port access (SPA) gynecologic surgery over a 10-year period.

Authors:  Joseph J Noh; Tae-Hyun Kim; Chul-Jung Kim; Tae-Joong Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Two-port access for laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer using conventional laparoscopic instruments.

Authors:  Kuan-Ju Huang; Ying-Xuan Li; Bor-Ching Sheu; Wen-Chun Chang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Trocar-site hernia following laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy in a middle-aged Japanese woman: an initial case report after 40 years of experience at a single center and a brief literature review.

Authors:  Kuniaki Ota; Yukiko Katagiri; Masafumi Katakura; Takafumi Mukai; Kentaro Nakaoka; Toshimitsu Maemura; Toshifumi Takahashi; Mineto Morita
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun Lin; Mubiao Liu; Haiyan Ye; Jianhui He; Jianguo Chen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-16       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Conventional versus single-incision laparoscopy for the surgical treatment of ovarian torsion.

Authors:  Murat Gozukucuk; Yetkin Karasu; Sena Münire Kaya; Erhan Yangır; Yusuf Üstün
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

9.  Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery vs conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zulipiyamu Tuoheti; Lili Han; Gulimire Mulati
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.