Roberto Cirocchi1, Michael Denis Kelly2, Ewen A Griffiths3, Renata Tabola4, Massimo Sartelli5, Luigi Carlini6, Stefania Ghersi7, Salomone Di Saverio8. 1. Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy. Electronic address: roberto.cirocchi@unipg.it. 2. Acute Surgical Unit, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia. Electronic address: mk@mdkelly.com. 3. Department of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Medical University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland. Electronic address: ewen.griffiths@uhb.nhs.uk. 4. Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2WB, United Kingdom. Electronic address: tabrena@op.pl. 5. Department of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy. Electronic address: Massimo.sartelli@gmail.com. 6. Section of Legal Medicine, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy. Electronic address: carlini.luigi@virgilio.it. 7. Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, AUSL Bologna, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy. Electronic address: stefania.ghersi@ausl.bologna.it. 8. Emergency Surgery and Trauma Surgery Unit, Maggiore Hospital Trauma Center, Bologna, Italy. Electronic address: salo75@inwind.it.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The incidence of duodenal perforation after ERCP ranges from 0.09% to 1.67% and mortality up to 8%. METHODS: This systematic review was registered in Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO. Stapfer classification of ERCP-related duodenal perforations was used. RESULTS: The systematic search yielded 259 articles. Most frequent post-ERCP perforation was Stapfer type II (58.4%), type I second most frequent perforation (17.8%) followed by Stapfer type III in 13.2% and type IV in 10.6%. Rate of NOM was lowest in Stapfer type I perforations (13%), moderate in type III lesions (58.1%) and high in other types of perforations (84.2% in type II and 84.6% in IV). In patients underwent early surgical treatment (<24 h from ERCP) the most frequent operation was simple duodenal suture with or without omentopexy (93.7%). In patients undergoing late surgical treatment (>24 h from ERCP) interventions performed were more complex. In type I lesions post-operative mortality rate was higher in patients underwent late operation (>24 h). In type I lesions, failure of NOM occurred in 42.8% of patients. In type II failure of NOM occurred in 28.9% of patients and in type III there was failure of NOM in only 11.1%, none in type IV. Postoperative mortality after NOM failure was 75% in type I, 22.5% in type II and none died after surgical treatment for failure of NOM in type III perforations. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review showed that in patients with Stapfer type I lesions, early surgical treatment gives better results, however the opposite seems true in Stapfer III and IV lesions.
INTRODUCTION: The incidence of duodenal perforation after ERCP ranges from 0.09% to 1.67% and mortality up to 8%. METHODS: This systematic review was registered in Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO. Stapfer classification of ERCP-related duodenal perforations was used. RESULTS: The systematic search yielded 259 articles. Most frequent post-ERCP perforation was Stapfer type II (58.4%), type I second most frequent perforation (17.8%) followed by Stapfer type III in 13.2% and type IV in 10.6%. Rate of NOM was lowest in Stapfer type I perforations (13%), moderate in type III lesions (58.1%) and high in other types of perforations (84.2% in type II and 84.6% in IV). In patients underwent early surgical treatment (<24 h from ERCP) the most frequent operation was simple duodenal suture with or without omentopexy (93.7%). In patients undergoing late surgical treatment (>24 h from ERCP) interventions performed were more complex. In type I lesions post-operative mortality rate was higher in patients underwent late operation (>24 h). In type I lesions, failure of NOM occurred in 42.8% of patients. In type II failure of NOM occurred in 28.9% of patients and in type III there was failure of NOM in only 11.1%, none in type IV. Postoperative mortality after NOM failure was 75% in type I, 22.5% in type II and none died after surgical treatment for failure of NOM in type III perforations. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review showed that in patients with Stapfer type I lesions, early surgical treatment gives better results, however the opposite seems true in Stapfer III and IV lesions.
Authors: Jason G Bill; Zachary Smith; Joseph Brancheck; Jeffrey Elsner; Paul Hobbs; Gabriel D Lang; Dayna S Early; Koushik Das; Thomas Hollander; Maria B Majella Doyle; Ryan C Fields; William G Hawkins; Steven M Strasberg; Chet Hammill; William C Chapman; Steven Edmundowicz; Daniel K Mullady; Vladimir M Kushnir Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 4.584