Literature DB >> 28619131

Comparison of sample types and diagnostic methods for in vivo detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae during early stages of infection.

Maria Pieters1, Jason Daniels2, Albert Rovira3.   

Abstract

Detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in live pigs during the early stages of infection is critical for timely implementation of control measures, but is technically challenging. This study compared the sensitivity of various sample types and diagnostic methods for detection of M. hyopneumoniae during the first 28days after experimental exposure. Twenty-one 8-week old pigs were intra-tracheally inoculated on day 0 with M. hyopneumoniae strain 232. Two age matched pigs were mock inoculated and maintained as negative controls. On post-inoculation days 0, 2, 5, 9, 14, 21 and 28, nasal swabs, laryngeal swabs, tracheobronchial lavage fluid, and blood samples were obtained from each pig and oral fluid samples were obtained from each room in which pigs were housed. Serum samples were assayed by ELISA for IgM and IgG M. hyopneumoniae antibodies and C-reactive protein. All other samples were tested for M. hyopneumoniae DNA by species-specific real-time PCR. Serum antibodies (IgG) to M. hyopneumoniae were detected in challenge-inoculated pigs on days 21 and 28. M. hyopneumoniae DNA was detected in samples from experimentally inoculated pigs beginning at 5days post-inoculation. Laryngeal swabs at all samplings beginning on day 5 showed the highest sensitivity for M. hyopneumoniae DNA Detection, while oral fluids showed the lowest sensitivity. Although laryngeal swabs are not considered the typical M. hyopneumoniae diagnostic sample, under the conditions of this study laryngeal swabs tested by PCR proved to be a practical and reliable diagnostic sample for M. hyopneumoniae detection in vivo during early-stage infection.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ELISA; In vivo; Laryngeal swabs; Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae; Real-time PCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28619131     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  17 in total

1.  Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae genetic variability within swine production flows.

Authors:  Alyssa M Betlach; Eduardo Fano; Amanda Sponheim; Robert Valeris-Chacin; Laura Dalquist; Randall S Singer; Maria Pieters
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.310

Review 2.  Perspectives for improvement of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae vaccines in pigs.

Authors:  Dominiek Maes; Filip Boyen; Bert Devriendt; Peter Kuhnert; Artur Summerfield; Freddy Haesebrouck
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 3.683

3.  Development of ELISA Using Recombinant Proteins for the Diagnosis of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Infection.

Authors:  Simone Simionatto; Silvana Beutinger Marchioro; Marcelo Dos Santos Barbosa; Vanessa Galli; Clarice Brink Brum; Sergio Jorge; Odir Antonio Dellagostin
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 2.461

4.  A field efficacy trial of a trivalent vaccine containing porcine circovirus type 2a and 2b, and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in three herds.

Authors:  Hyungmin Um; Siyeon Yang; Taehwan Oh; Hyejean Cho; Kee Hwan Park; Jeongmin Suh; Chanhee Chae
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2021-10-22

5.  Use of trachea-bronchial swab qPCR testing to confirm Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae seropositivity in an SPF breeding herd.

Authors:  Frédéric Vangroenweghe; Eveline Willems; Jiří Malášek; Olivier Thas; Dominiek Maes
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2018-06-01

6.  Validation of use of the miniPCR thermocycler for Ebola and Zika virus detection.

Authors:  Everardo González-González; Jackelin Lizeth Mendoza-Ramos; Sara Cristina Pedroza; Aimé Alexandra Cuellar-Monterrubio; Alan Roberto Márquez-Ipiña; Daniel Lira-Serhan; Grissel Trujillo-de Santiago; Mario Moisés Alvarez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Serum metabolite markers of early Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in pigs.

Authors:  Meera Surendran Nair; Dan Yao; Chi Chen; Maria Pieters
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.683

8.  The first assessment to detect Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae by sampling laryngeal swabs to investigate sow stability in South Korea.

Authors:  YuSik Oh; JongHyuk Baek; JoongBok Lee; Sun-Hee Cho; Changhoon Park
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Comparative Evaluation of Growth Performance between Bivalent and Trivalent Vaccines Containing Porcine Circovirus Type 2 (PCV2) and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in a Herd with Subclinical PCV2d Infection and Enzootic Pneumonia.

Authors:  Hyungmin Um; Siyeon Yang; Taehwan Oh; Keehwan Park; Hyejean Cho; Jeongmin Suh; Kyung-Duk Min; Chanhee Chae
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-03

10.  Dynamics and chronology of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae strain 232 infection in experimentally inoculated swine.

Authors:  Henrique M S Almeida; Marina L Mechler-Dreibi; Karina Sonálio; Marcela M Ferreira; Paulo E B Martinelli; Igor R H Gatto; Dominiek Maes; Hélio J Montassier; Luís G Oliveira
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2021-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.