Literature DB >> 28617954

Mind the movement: Frontal asymmetry stands for behavioral motivation, bilateral frontal activation for behavior.

Johannes Rodrigues1, Mathias Müller1, Andreas Mühlberger2, Johannes Hewig1.   

Abstract

Frontal asymmetry has been investigated over the past 30 years, and several theories have been developed about its meaning. The original theory of Davidson and its diversification by Harmon-Jones & Allen allocated approach motivation to relative left frontal brain activity and withdrawal motivation to relative right frontal brain activity. Hewig and colleagues extended this theory by adding bilateral frontal activation representing a biological correlate of the behavioral activation system if actual behavior is shown. Wacker and colleagues formulated a theory related to the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory by Gray & McNaughton. Here, relative left frontal brain activation represents the revised behavioral activation system and behavior, while relative right frontal brain activation represents the revised behavioral inhibition system, representing the experience of conflict. These theories were investigated with a newly developed paradigm where participants were able to move around freely in a virtual T maze via joystick while having their EEG recorded. Analyzing the influence of frontal brain activation during this virtual reality task on observable behavior for 30 participants, we found more relative left frontal brain activation during approach behavior and more relative right brain activation for withdrawal behavior of any kind. Additionally, there was more bilateral frontal brain activation when participants were engaged in behavior compared to doing nothing. Hence, this study provides evidence for the idea that frontal asymmetry stands for behavioral approach or avoidance motivation, and bilateral frontal activation stands for behavior. Additionally, observable behavior is not only determined by frontal asymmetry, but also by relevant traits.
© 2017 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; alpha rhythm; emotion; individual differences; motivation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28617954     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  5 in total

1.  Asymmetric hemisphere activation in tenderness: evidence from EEG signals.

Authors:  Guozhen Zhao; Yulin Zhang; Yan Ge; Yan Zheng; Xianghong Sun; Kan Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Individual EEG measures of attention, memory, and motivation predict population level TV viewership and Twitter engagement.

Authors:  Avgusta Y Shestyuk; Karthik Kasinathan; Viswajith Karapoondinott; Robert T Knight; Ram Gurumoorthy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A pilot randomized clinical trial of tDCS for increasing exercise engagement in individuals with elevated depressive symptoms: Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics.

Authors:  Ana M Abrantes; Sarah L Garnaat; Michael D Stein; Lisa A Uebelacker; David M Williams; Linda L Carpenter; Benjamin D Greenberg; Julie Desaulniers; Daniel Audet
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2022-08-20

4.  Standardizing continuous data classifications in a virtual T-maze using two-layer feedforward networks.

Authors:  Johannes Rodrigues; Philipp Ziebell; Mathias Müller; Johannes Hewig
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  EPOS: EEG Processing Open-Source Scripts.

Authors:  Johannes Rodrigues; Martin Weiß; Johannes Hewig; John J B Allen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.677

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.