Literature DB >> 28617741

Soft-Tissue Reconstruction of Large Spinal Defects: A 12-Year Institutional Experience.

Chris Devulapalli1, Justin M Broyles, Ricardo Bello, Tarek Elgendy, Georgia Yalanis, Richard Redett, Gedge D Rosson, Justin M Sacks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal resections can lead to defects requiring soft-tissue reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to review the authors' institutional experience with reconstruction of spinal defects and identify risk factors predictive of wound complications, focusing on timing of reconstruction with ablative surgery.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent spinal resection and required soft-tissue reconstruction from 2002 to 2014. Logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for complications.
RESULTS: Of 289 reconstructions performed in 259 patients, 64 cases (22.1 percent) had major wound complications requiring reoperation. Lumbosacral defects were the most common location (43.6 percent) and paraspinous muscle flaps were the preferred reconstructive method used for all defect regions. A total of 224 reconstructions (77.5 percent) were performed immediately at the time of spinal surgery, and 65 (22.5 percent) were performed in delayed fashion as a result of wound complications from previous spinal surgery. Patients undergoing immediate reconstruction had significantly lower rates of instrumentation removal (0.9 percent versus 4.6 percent; p = 0.043), unplanned reoperations (0.5 versus 1.3; p < 0.001), and mortality (0.9 percent versus 9.2 percent; p < 0.001) compared with those undergoing delayed reconstruction. On logistic regression analysis, presence of instrumentation (OR, 3.2; p = 0.012), requirement for a free flap (OR, 9.0; p = 0.016), and spinal cord exposure (OR, 2.6; p = 0.036) were associated with increased odds of a major wound complication.
CONCLUSION: Spinal resections carry significant surgical-site morbidity, and selection of high-risk patients for immediate reconstruction with locoregional muscle flaps may be beneficial for improving wound-related outcomes. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28617741     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  4 in total

1.  Prophylactic muscle flap reconstruction after complex spine surgery for degenerative disease: case series and institutional protocol.

Authors:  Nikhil Adapa; Nikhil Jain; Allison Capek; Rajiv Chandawarkar; Safdar N Khan; Yazeed M Gussous; Elizabeth Yu
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-09

2.  Locoregional Flap Closure for High-risk Multilevel Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Jacob R Rinkinen; Rachel E Weitzman; Jason B Clain; Jonathan Lans; John H Shin; Kyle R Eberlin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-04-21

3.  Reconstruction of Lumbar Spinal Defects: Case Series, Literature Review, and Treatment Algorithm.

Authors:  Lauren T Daly; Ricardo Ortiz; John H Shin; Branko Bojovic; Kyle R Eberlin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-01-11

4.  Immediate Reconstruction of Complex Spinal Wounds Is Associated with Increased Hardware Retention and Fewer Wound-related Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander F Mericli; Rene D Largo; Patrick B Garvey; Laurence Rhines; Justin Bird; Jun Liu; Donald Baumann; Charles E Butler
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-01-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.