Literature DB >> 28617731

Retention Rates in New Contact Lens Wearers.

Anna Sulley1, Graeme Young, Chris Hunt, Sarah McCready, Marie-Therese Targett, Ruth Craven.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the retention rate (RR) for neophyte patients fitted with contact lenses (CLs) and to identify factors associated with retention and dropout.
METHOD: This multisite, sponsor-masked registry study evaluated the 1-year status of neophyte CL wearers fitted in a representative range of UK practices. A total of 26 UK investigational sites each recruited up to 89 neophyte patients. The participants were requested to complete surveys at 1 month (±1 week from date of fitting), 3 months (±2 weeks), and 12 months (±3 weeks) online or through phone. Participants were contacted by email (or phone) and invited to complete an online survey that asked a range of questions regarding their CL wearing experience.
RESULTS: Of the 531 participants recruited, 65.3% (347/531) responded to at least one follow-up survey and 42.3% (225/531) responded to all three surveys. One in four patients showed discontinued CL wear by 12 months. Based on evaluable subjects at 12 months, the RR was 77.6% (194/250, 95% confidence interval: 72.0-82.3). The most common reason for discontinuation was problems with vision (41%), followed by discomfort (36%) and handling problems (25%). The factors affecting first-year RRs: sex, spherical refraction, lens usage (full time or part time), and supply method (collected or posted).
CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study, the first-year RR for neophyte CL wearers was 77.6%. This was consistent with that noted in a retrospective study: 74.0%. As with the previous study, the commonly cited reason for discontinuation was visual problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28617731     DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye Contact Lens        ISSN: 1542-2321            Impact factor:   2.018


  4 in total

1.  Contact Lens Adaption in Neophytes.

Authors:  Andrew D Pucker; Kelsy Steele; Erin Rueff; Quentin X Franklin; Kate McClure; Keyur Savla; Jeffrey J Walline
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.106

Review 2.  A Review of Contact Lens Dropout.

Authors:  Andrew D Pucker; Anna A Tichenor
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2020-06-25

3.  Clinical Comparison of a Silicone Hydrogel and a Conventional Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lens.

Authors:  Jason Miller; Bradley Giedd; Lakshman N Subbaraman
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-29

4.  Comparison of the Pre-Lens Tear Film Stability and Visual Performance of a Novel and Two Other Daily Disposable Contact Lenses in Healthcare Professionals Wearing Facial Masks for Prolonged Time.

Authors:  Aysegul Penbe; Hatice Selen Kanar; Raziye Donmez Gun
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2022-10-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.