Literature DB >> 28617669

Representativeness of individual external doses estimated for one quarter of residents in the Fukushima Prefecture after the nuclear disaster: the Fukushima Health Management Survey.

Tetsuo Ishikawa1, Hideto Takahashi, Seiji Yasumura, Akira Ohtsuru, Akira Sakai, Tetsuya Ohira, Ritsu Sakata, Kotaro Ozasa, Keiichi Akahane, Shunsuke Yonai, Osamu Kurihara, Kenji Kamiya, Masafumi Abe.   

Abstract

After the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, the Fukushima Health Management Survey (FHMS) was launched. The Basic Survey, a component of FHMS, is a questionnaire used to survey residents across the Fukushima Prefecture about their behaviour in the first 4 months after the accident. The questionnaire findings are used to determine individual external doses by linking behaviour data to a computer programme with daily gamma ray dose rate maps, drawn after the accident. Through 30 June 2015, the response rate was only 27.2% (558 550 population), indicating that the findings might not be generalisable because of poor representativeness of the population. The objective of this study was to clarify if the data from the FHMS Basic Survey were representative of the entire population, by conducting a new survey to compare the external doses between non-respondents and respondents in the previous survey. A total of 5350 subjects were randomly selected from 7 local regions of Fukushima Prefecture. An interview survey was conducted with the non-respondents to the FHMS Basic Survey. A total of 990 responses were obtained from the previous non-responders by interview survey. For the regions Kempoku, Kenchu, Kennan, Aizu, Minami-Aizu, Soso, and Iwaki, differences in mean effective dose (95% confidence interval) in mSv between the non-responders and previous responders were 0.12 (0.01-0.23), -0.09 (-0.21-0.03), -0.06 (-0.18-0.07), 0.05 (-0.04-0.14), 0.01 (-0.01-0.02), 0.09 (0.01-0.17), 0.09 (0.00-0.17), respectively. The differences fall neither within the interval (-∞, -0.25) nor within the interval (0.25, ∞). These findings imply that mean effective doses between the previous and new respondents were not different, with a significantly indifferent region of 0.25 mSv according to equivalence tests. The present study indicates that the dose distribution obtained from about one-quarter of Fukushima residents represents the dose distribution for the entire Fukushima Prefecture.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28617669     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/aa6649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiol Prot        ISSN: 0952-4746            Impact factor:   1.394


  3 in total

1.  Association between the detection rate of thyroid cancer and the external radiation dose-rate after the nuclear power plant accidents in Fukushima, Japan.

Authors:  Hidehiko Yamamoto; Keiji Hayashi; Hagen Scherb
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Nested matched case control study for the Japan Fukushima Health Management Survey's first full-scale (second-round) thyroid examination.

Authors:  Hideto Takahashi; Seiji Yasumura; Kunihiko Takahashi; Tetsuya Ohira; Akira Ohtsuru; Sanae Midorikawa; Satoru Suzuki; Hiroki Shimura; Tetsuo Ishikawa; Akira Sakai; Shinichi Suzuki; Susumu Yokoya; Koichi Tanigawa; Hitoshi Ohto; Kenji Kamiya
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  CURRENT STATUS OF THE FUKUSHIMA HEALTH MANAGEMENT SURVEY.

Authors:  Atsushi Kumagai; Koichi Tanigawa
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 0.972

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.