Literature DB >> 28617667

A heuristic computational model of basic cellular processes and oxygenation during spheroid-dependent biofabrication.

T J Sego1, U Kasacheuski, D Hauersperger, A Tovar, N I Moldovan.   

Abstract

An emerging approach in biofabrication is the creation of 3D tissue constructs through scaffold-free, cell spheroid-only methods. The basic mechanism in this technology is spheroid fusion, which is driven by the minimization of energy, the same biophysical mechanism that governs spheroid formation. However, other factors such as oxygen and metabolite accessibility within spheroids impact on spheroid properties and their ability to form larger-scale structures. The goal of our work is to develop a simulation platform eventually capable of predicting the conditions that minimize metabolism-related cell loss within spheroids. To describe the behavior and dynamic properties of the cells in response to their neighbors and to transient nutrient concentration fields, we developed a hybrid discrete-continuous heuristic model, combining a cellular Potts-type approach with field equations applied to a randomly populated spheroid cross-section of prescribed cell-type constituency. This model allows for the description of: (i) cellular adhesiveness and motility; (ii) interactions with concentration fields, including diffusivity and oxygen consumption; and (iii) concentration-dependent, stochastic cell dynamics, driven by metabolite-dependent cell death. Our model readily captured the basic steps of spheroid-based biofabrication (as specifically dedicated to scaffold-free bioprinting), including intra-spheroid cell sorting (both in 2D and 3D implementations), spheroid defect closure, and inter-spheroid fusion. Moreover, we found that when hypoxia occurring at the core of the spheroid was set to trigger cell death, this was amplified upon spheroid fusion, but could be mitigated by external oxygen supplementation. In conclusion, optimization and further development of scaffold-free bioprinting techniques could benefit from our computational model which is able to simultaneously account for both cellular dynamics and metabolism in constructs obtained by scaffold-free biofabrication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28617667     DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa6ed4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  6 in total

1.  The potential role of 3D-bioprinting in xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Ping Li; Wenjun Zhang; Lester J Smith; David Ayares; David K C Cooper; Burcin Ekser
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.640

2.  Engineering Functional Rat Ovarian Spheroids Using Granulosa and Theca Cells.

Authors:  Myung Jae Jeon; Young Sik Choi; Il Dong Kim; Tracy Criswell; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo; John D Jackson
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 3.  Progress in scaffold-free bioprinting for cardiovascular medicine.

Authors:  Nicanor I Moldovan
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 4.  Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs.

Authors:  Nicanor I Moldovan; Leni Moldovan; Michael Raghunath
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2018-12-26

5.  Generation of multicellular spatiotemporal models of population dynamics from ordinary differential equations, with applications in viral infection.

Authors:  T J Sego; Josua O Aponte-Serrano; Juliano F Gianlupi; James A Glazier
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 7.431

Review 6.  3D Printing: Advancement in Biogenerative Engineering to Combat Shortage of Organs and Bioapplicable Materials.

Authors:  Arpana Parihar; Vasundhara Pandita; Avinash Kumar; Dipesh Singh Parihar; Nidhi Puranik; Tapas Bajpai; Raju Khan
Journal:  Regen Eng Transl Med       Date:  2021-07-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.