Literature DB >> 28617619

Early Functional Outcomes of Periacetabular Osteotomy After Failed Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Symptomatic Acetabular Dysplasia.

Benjamin F Ricciardi1, Kara G Fields2, Catherine Wentzel1, Bryan T Kelly1, Ernest L Sink1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Persistent acetabular dysplasia is a common reason for the failure of hip arthroscopic surgery; however, the effect of prior hip arthroscopic surgery on functional outcomes after subsequent periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is unknown. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to (1) compare demographic and radiological findings in patients who had and had not undergone previous hip arthroscopic surgery before PAO for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia and (2) compare the short-term, hip-specific patient-reported outcomes in these same patient populations. It was hypothesized that prior hip arthroscopic surgery is associated with worse early functional outcomes in PAO. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study design was utilized. Patients undergoing PAO were enrolled from a single-center, prospective hip preservation registry from March 2011 to April 2015. Patients with a minimum of 1-year clinical follow-up with preoperative and postoperative outcome scores undergoing PAO were eligible for inclusion (n = 93 patients; mean clinical follow-up, 24 months [range, 11-58 months]). The study group consisted of patients undergoing PAO for symptomatic hip dysplasia after prior hip arthroscopic surgery (PREVSCOPE group; 22 patients, 25 hips). Patients undergoing PAO without prior hip arthroscopic surgery (PAOALONE group; 71 patients, 85 hips) were included as a comparison group. Demographic and radiological variables were recorded. Postoperative functional outcome scores (modified Harris Hip Score [mHHS], Hip Outcome Score [HOS], and International Hip Outcome Tool [iHOT-33]) were recorded at 6 months and annually postoperatively.
RESULTS: There were no demographic differences between the 2 groups at baseline. Acetabular version, femoral version, Tönnis grade, preoperative lateral center edge angle, and intraoperative procedures were not different between the 2 groups. At 1-year follow-up from the last hip surgical procedure, the mean (±SD) mHHS (73 ± 14 vs 86 ± 14, respectively; P < .001), HOS-Activities of Daily Living (84 ± 12 vs 93 ± 11, respectively; P = .007), HOS-Sport (62 ± 25 vs 85 ± 18, respectively; P < .001), and iHOT-33 (62 ± 21 vs 79 ± 20, respectively; P = .004) were decreased in the PREVSCOPE group versus the PAOALONE group. At last follow-up (mean, 18 months from the last hip surgical procedure), the mHHS and HOS-Sport were lower in the PREVSCOPE group versus the PAOALONE group. There was no difference in complication or reoperation rates between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION: Failed hip arthroscopic surgery before PAO for symptomatic hip dysplasia is associated with lower hip-specific functional outcomes within the first 1 year of follow-up despite similar baseline demographic and radiological characteristics. These differences persisted in certain outcome scores (mHHS, HOS-Sport) at last follow-up but were less pronounced than at 1 year.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acetabular dysplasia; hip arthroscopic surgery; periacetabular osteotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28617619     DOI: 10.1177/0363546517710011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  9 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation and Treatment of Borderline Dysplasia: Moving Beyond the Lateral Center Edge Angle.

Authors:  Nicholas J Vaudreuil; Michael P McClincy
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-02

2.  Outcomes of Surgical Management of Borderline Hip Dysplasia: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cameron Barton; Elizabeth Scott; Zain M Khazi; Michael Willey; Robert Westermann
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

Review 3.  Periacetabular osteotomy to treat hip dysplasia: a systematic review of harms and benefits.

Authors:  Lisa U Tønning; Michael O'Brien; Adam Semciw; Christopher Stewart; Joanne L Kemp; Inger Mechlenburg
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 2.928

4.  Periacetabular Osteotomy Improves Pain and Function in Patients With Lateral Center-edge Angle Between 18° and 25°, but Are These Hips Really Borderline Dysplastic?

Authors:  Michael P McClincy; James D Wylie; Young-Jo Kim; Michael B Millis; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  A comparison of 6-month outcomes between periacetabular osteotomy with concomitant hip arthroscopy to isolated hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Thomas Ellis; Dave Kohlrieser; Brian Rao; Keelan Enseki; Adam Popchak; RobRoy L Martin
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 6.  The management of the painful borderline dysplastic hip.

Authors:  Michael C Wyatt; Martin Beck
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2018-04-05

7.  Standardizing the Diagnostic Evaluation of Nonarthritic Hip Pain Through the Delphi Method.

Authors:  Michael P McClincy; James D Wylie; David N Williams; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-05

8.  Arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in adolescents-5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Søren Winge; Sophie Winge; Otto Kraemer; Christian Dippmann; Per Hölmich
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2021-07-03

9.  Is Hip Arthroscopy an Adequate Therapy for the Borderline Dysplastic Hip? Correlation Between Radiologic Findings and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Alexander Zimmerer; Marco M Schneider; Rainer Nietschke; Wolfgang Miehlke; Christian Sobau
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-05-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.