Literature DB >> 28616840

End of 2016: Can We Save Research from Predators in 2017?

Aamir Raoof Memon1.   

Abstract

At the beginning of every year, we expect to see worthwhile improvements on the past. The end of 2016 showcased many important issues in the scientific world, ranging from criticisms of research misconduct and fraud to the introduction of new scientometrics. Despite the scientific community's continuing efforts, predatory journals and publishers are still on the rise, and the Beall's list calls attention to the need to take a firm action across the board. This short opinion piece highlights research conducted by the scholarly community on research publication predators during 2016, and offers suggestions as to how to bring about future improvements.

Keywords:  Journal; Predatory; Publishers; Research fraud; Scientometrics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28616840     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9915-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  8 in total

1.  Firm action needed on predatory journals.

Authors:  Jocalyn Clark; Richard Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-01-16

2.  Controversial impact factor gets a heavyweight rival.

Authors:  Richard Van Noorden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Continued growth, a new metric, same high quality!

Authors:  Michael V Vitiello; Jean Krieger
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 11.609

4.  Stop Predatory Publishers Now.

Authors:  Margaret A Winker
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Do You Ignore Information Security in Your Journal Website?

Authors:  Mehdi Dadkhah; Glenn Borchardt; Mohammad Lagzian
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  ResearchGate is no longer reliable: leniency towards ghost journals may decrease its impact on the scientific community.

Authors:  Aamir Raoof Memon
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 0.781

7.  Scholarly Black Market.

Authors:  Shahryar Sorooshian
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  The Journal Impact Factor Should Not Be Discarded.

Authors:  Lutz Bornmann; Alexander I Pudovkin
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.153

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Predatory Journals Spamming for Publications: What Should Researchers Do?

Authors:  Aamir Raoof Memon
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Are We as Otorhinolaryngologists Aware of the Danger of Predatory Journals?

Authors:  Taner Kemal Erdağ
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-09-01

3.  Announcing the Editorial Board Fellowship Program of the American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology.

Authors:  Larissa A Shimoda; Chunxue Bai; Nathan W Bartlett; Julie A Bastarache; Carol Feghali-Bostwick; Wolfgang M Kuebler; Y S Prakash; Eric P Schmidt; Rory E Morty
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 6.011

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.