Xingang Li1, Shusen Sun2, Qiang Wang3, Zhigang Zhao4. 1. Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China. 2. College of Pharmacy, Western New England University, Springfield, MA, 01119, USA. 3. Intensive Care Unit, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China. 4. Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China. 1022zzg@sina.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: For patients with intracranial infection, local intrathecal administration of meropenem may be a useful method to obtain a sufficient drug concentration in the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF). However, a large inter-individual variability may pose treatment efficacy at risk. This study aimed to identify factors affecting drug concentration in the CSF using population pharmacokinetics method. METHODS: After craniotomy, aneurysm patients with an indwelling lumbar cistern drainage tube who received a combined intravenous and intrathecal administration of meropenem for the treatment of suspected intracranial infection were enrolled. Venous blood and CSF specimens were collected for determining meropenem concentrations. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling method was used to fit blood and CSF concentrations simultaneously and to develop the population pharmacokinetic model. The proposed model was applied to simulate dosage regimens. RESULTS: A three-compartmental model was established to describe meropenem in vivo behavior. Lumbar CSF drainage resulted in a drug loss, and drug clearance in CSF (CLCSF) was employed to describe this. The covariate analysis found that the drainage volume (mL/day) was strongly associated with CLCSF, and the effect of creatinine clearance was significant on the clearance of meropenem in blood (CL). Visual predictive check suggested that the proposed pharmacokinetic model agreed well with the observations. Simulation showed that both intravenous and intrathecal doses should be increased with the increases of minimum inhibitory concentration and daily CSF drainage volume. CONCLUSION: This model incorporates covariates of the creatinine clearance and the drainage volume, and a simple to use dosage regimen table was created to guide clinicians with meropenem dosing.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: For patients with intracranial infection, local intrathecal administration of meropenem may be a useful method to obtain a sufficient drug concentration in the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF). However, a large inter-individual variability may pose treatment efficacy at risk. This study aimed to identify factors affecting drug concentration in the CSF using population pharmacokinetics method. METHODS: After craniotomy, aneurysmpatients with an indwelling lumbar cistern drainage tube who received a combined intravenous and intrathecal administration of meropenem for the treatment of suspected intracranial infection were enrolled. Venous blood and CSF specimens were collected for determining meropenem concentrations. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling method was used to fit blood and CSF concentrations simultaneously and to develop the population pharmacokinetic model. The proposed model was applied to simulate dosage regimens. RESULTS: A three-compartmental model was established to describe meropenem in vivo behavior. Lumbar CSF drainage resulted in a drug loss, and drug clearance in CSF (CLCSF) was employed to describe this. The covariate analysis found that the drainage volume (mL/day) was strongly associated with CLCSF, and the effect of creatinine clearance was significant on the clearance of meropenem in blood (CL). Visual predictive check suggested that the proposed pharmacokinetic model agreed well with the observations. Simulation showed that both intravenous and intrathecal doses should be increased with the increases of minimum inhibitory concentration and daily CSF drainage volume. CONCLUSION: This model incorporates covariates of the creatinine clearance and the drainage volume, and a simple to use dosage regimen table was created to guide clinicians with meropenem dosing.
Authors: Yahia Z Al-Tamimi; Deepti Bhargava; Richard G Feltbower; Gregory Hall; Anthony J P Goddard; Audrey C Quinn; Stuart A Ross Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Eun Kyoung Chung; S Christian Cheatham; Megan R Fleming; Daniel P Healy; Michael B Kays Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Ute Blassmann; Anka C Roehr; Otto R Frey; Cornelia Vetter-Kerkhoff; Niklas Thon; William Hope; Josef Briegel; Volker Huge Journal: Crit Care Date: 2016-10-24 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Dagan O Lonsdale; Emma H Baker; Karin Kipper; Charlotte Barker; Barbara Philips; Andrew Rhodes; Mike Sharland; Joseph F Standing Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 4.335