| Literature DB >> 28616726 |
Peter Bannas1,2, Scott B Reeder3,4,5,6,7.
Abstract
Many scientific manuscripts submitted for publication are limited by fundamental mistakes in their preparation, leading to rejection. We describe how to write a well-organized radiological research manuscript containing all of the important ingredients for effective communication of a hypothesis-driven scientific study in the context of medical imaging. KEY POINTS: • Mistakes in the preparation of scientific manuscripts lead to rejection. • Scientific writing, like any important skill, can be learned. • A well-developed approach will improve the quality of scientific writing. • High-quality scientific writing is essential to communicate research results. • A well-organized manuscript effectively communicates a hypothesis-driven scientific study.Entities:
Keywords: Diagnostic imaging; Manuscripts; Medical writing; Publication components; Radiology
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28616726 PMCID: PMC6599681 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4879-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Radiol ISSN: 0938-7994 Impact factor: 5.315