Literature DB >> 28616726

How to write an original radiological research manuscript.

Peter Bannas1,2, Scott B Reeder3,4,5,6,7.   

Abstract

Many scientific manuscripts submitted for publication are limited by fundamental mistakes in their preparation, leading to rejection. We describe how to write a well-organized radiological research manuscript containing all of the important ingredients for effective communication of a hypothesis-driven scientific study in the context of medical imaging. KEY POINTS: • Mistakes in the preparation of scientific manuscripts lead to rejection. • Scientific writing, like any important skill, can be learned. • A well-developed approach will improve the quality of scientific writing. • High-quality scientific writing is essential to communicate research results. • A well-organized manuscript effectively communicates a hypothesis-driven scientific study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic imaging; Manuscripts; Medical writing; Publication components; Radiology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28616726      PMCID: PMC6599681          DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4879-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  18 in total

Review 1.  How to get published: seven easy steps.

Authors:  John W Albarran; Julie Scholes
Journal:  Nurs Crit Care       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.325

2.  How to write a paper for publication.

Authors:  F L Rosenfeldt; J T Dowling; S Pepe; M J Fullerton
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.975

3.  Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR.

Authors:  F S Chew
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: some improvements after 10 years of STARD.

Authors:  Daniël A Korevaar; Junfeng Wang; W Annefloor van Enst; Mariska M Leeflang; Lotty Hooft; Nynke Smidt; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Advice to authors.

Authors:  S S Siegelman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  [Instructions for original radiological research manuscripts].

Authors:  P Bannas; G Adam; T A Bley
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2013-03-14

7.  Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals.

Authors:  W R Eyler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of hepatic steatosis: Validation in ex vivo human livers.

Authors:  Peter Bannas; Harald Kramer; Diego Hernando; Rashmi Agni; Ashley M Cunningham; Rakesh Mandal; Utaroh Motosugi; Samir D Sharma; Alejandro Munoz del Rio; Luis Fernandez; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 9.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Negativity towards negative results: a discussion of the disconnect between scientific worth and scientific culture.

Authors:  Natalie Matosin; Elisabeth Frank; Martin Engel; Jeremy S Lum; Kelly A Newell
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.758

View more
  1 in total

1.  Does the quality of the presentation influence the outcome of a submitted manuscript? A plea for including "How to submit" in medical education.

Authors:  Frédéric Crampon; Grégoire Prum; Olivier Trost; Bruno Grignon; Fabrice Duparc
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 1.246

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.