| Literature DB >> 28616522 |
Takaaki Furihata1, Shintaro Kinugawa1, Shingo Takada1, Arata Fukushima1, Masashige Takahashi1, Tsuneaki Homma1, Yoshihiro Masaki1, Masaya Tsuda1, Junichi Matsumoto1, Wataru Mizushima1, Shouji Matsushima1, Takashi Yokota1, Hiroyuki Tsutsui1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transverse aortic constriction (TAC) operation is used as an experimental model of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and LV failure in mice. The severity of LV remodeling or failure may depend on the degree of TAC, but is variable among operated animals. Therefore, we tried to identify the optimal diameter of TAC to create this model with ease and high reproducibility. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Cardiac failure; Cardiac hypertrophy; Methodology; Mice; Transverse aortic constriction
Year: 2016 PMID: 28616522 PMCID: PMC5441312 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.03.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc ISSN: 2352-9067
Fig. 1Photographs of TAC operation.
(A) Mice were subjected to TAC operation using the gauge. (B) Three gauges used with TAC operation: top; a 0.400 mm gauge needle, middle; a 0.385 mm pin gauge, bottom; a 0.375 mm pin gauge.
Fig. 2Survival curves in TAC operation.
(A) Mice were subjected to TAC operation with three kinds of gauges and followed for 4 weeks. Sham, n = 21; 0.400 mm, n = 11; 0.385 mm, n = 29; 0.375 mm, n = 22.
(B) Mice were subjected to TAC operation with the 0.385 mm pin gauge and followed for 5 months. n = 20.
LV function and structure after four weeks after TAC.
| Sham | 0.400 | 0.385 | 0.375 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 21 | 9 | 15 | 9 |
| Organ weights | ||||
| BW (g) | 26.0 ± 0.3 | 24.8 ± 0.4 | 24.4 ± 0.3 | 23.7 ± 0.7 |
| HW/BW (mg/g) | 4.4 ± 0.0 | 6.6 ± 0.3 | 9.7 ± 0.5 | 10.2 ± 0.8 |
| LVW/BW (mg/g) | 3.1 ± 0.0 | 4.9 ± 0.2 | 6.7 ± 0.3 | 7.1 ± 0.5 |
| Lung/BW (mg/g) | 5.8 ± 0.1 | 6.4 ± 0.4 | 14.1 ± 1.5 | 16.1 ± 2.2 |
| ⟨Echocardiographic data⟩ | ||||
| N | 21 | 9 | 14 | 9 |
| HR (bpm) | 532 ± 10 | 505 ± 17 | 520 ± 19 | 496 ± 16 |
| LV EDD (mm) | 3.2 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.2 | 3.8 ± 0.2 | 3.8 ± 0.2 |
| LV ESD (mm) | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.2 |
| %FS | 47 ± 2 | 38 ± 5 | 32 ± 3 | 32 ± 3 |
| Anterior wall thickness (mm) | 0.8 ± 0.0 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 |
| Posterior wall thickness (mm) | 0.8 ± 0.0 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 |
Data are shown as mean ± SE. N, number; BW, body weight; HW, heart weight; LVW, left ventricle weight; HR, heart rate; EDD, end-diastolic diameter; ESD, end-systolic diameter; %FS, percent fractional shortening.
P < 0.05 vs. Sham.
P < 0.05 vs. 0.400 mm.
LV Function and Structure following TAC with the 0.385 mm pin gauge.
| Control | 1 Week | 4 Weeks | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N | 11 | 9 | 15 |
| BW(g) | 21.4 ± 0.3 | 20.6 ± 0.5 | 24.4 ± 0.3 |
| Organ weights | |||
| HW/BW(mg/g) | 4.7 ± 0.0 | 7.3 ± 0.2 | 9.7 ± 0.5 |
| LVW/BW(mg/g) | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 6.7 ± 0.3 |
| Lung/BW(mg/g) | 6.4 ± 0.1 | 9.5 ± 1.1 | 14.1 ± 1.5 |
| ⟨Echocardiographic data⟩ | |||
| N | 8 | 7 | 14 |
| HR(bpm) | 541 ± 11 | 557 ± 14 | 520 ± 19 |
| LV EDD(mm) | 3.2 ± 0.1 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 3.8 ± 0.2 |
| LV ESD(mm) | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.2 |
| %FS | 51 ± 3 | 46 ± 5 | 32 ± 3 |
| Anterior wall thickness(mm) | 0.8 ± 0.0 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 |
| Posterior wall thickness(mm) | 0.8 ± 0.0 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 |
| ⟨Hemodynamic data⟩ | |||
| N | 8 | 7 | 7 |
| HR(bpm) | 543 ± 20 | 521 ± 15 | 536 ± 23 |
| Ao SBP(mmHg) | 130 ± 3 | 179 ± 3 | 243 ± 6 |
| Ao DBP(mmHg) | 91 ± 4 | 77 ± 3 | 85 ± 4 |
| LV EDP(mmHg) | 1.8 ± 0.5 | 7.0 ± 2.4 | 8.2 ± 1.6 |
Data are shown as mean ± SE. N, number; BW, body weight; HW, heart weight; LVW, left ventricle weight; HR, heart rate; EDD, end-diastolic diameter; ESD, end-systolic diameter; %FS, percent fractional shortening; Ao, aorta; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; EDD, end-diastolic pressure.
P < 0.05 vs. Control.
P < 0.05 vs. 1 Week.
Fig. 3Representative echocardiographic and histological images of control, and 1 and 4 weeks after TAC operation with the 0.385 mm pin gauge.
(A) Representative echocardiograph and histological images from the various groups.
(B) Representative histological images from the various groups. Scale Bar, 500 μm.
(C) Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stains from the various groups.
(D) Masson trichrome (MT) stains from the various groups.
(E) Summary data for cross sectional area. n = 3 for each. Scale Bar, 100 μm.
(F) Summary data for collagen volume. n = 3 for each. Scale Bar, 100 μm.
⁎P < 0.05 vs. Control, †P < 0.05 vs. 1 Week, Ctrl, Control; 1 Week, 1 Week; 4 Weeks, 4 Weeks.