Literature DB >> 28616267

Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a novel prognostic indicator for advanced ESCC after surgical resection.

Mingjian Yang1,2, Hongdian Zhang1,2, Zhao Ma1,2, Lei Gong1,2, Chuangui Chen1,2, Peng Ren1,2, Xiaobin Shang1,2, Peng Tang1,2, Hongjing Jiang1,2, Zhentao Yu1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To investigate the prognostic value of the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after surgical resection.
METHODS: Clinical data of 260 patients with advanced ESCC undergoing surgical resection were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analysis were done using the chi-square test and Cox regression model. Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the association of pathologic nodal (pN) and LODDS with 3- or 5-year overall survival (OS). The cut-point analyses were performed to determine whether there was a cutoff LODDS related to the greatest OS difference.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 30 months (range, 3 to 106 months). The 1-, 3-, 5-year OS rates were 70.0%, 41.9% and 30.3%, respectively. Univariate analyses indicated that the 5-year OS rates were 51.2%, 30.5%, 24.6%, and 14.2% in LODDS1, LODDS2, LODDS3, and LODDS4, respectively, and the median survival times were 68.7, 34.6, 24.0, and 14.6 months, respectively (P=0.000) for all patients, and subgroup analysis showed the effect did not change in 155 patients without lymph node (LN) metastasis (P=0.024). Multivariate analysis showed that LODDS [hazard ratio (HR) =1.309, P=0.003] to be independent and significant prognostic factors for all patients, so as in node-negative patients LODDS (HR =1.610, P=0.038). The AUC of LODDS stage (AUC =0.630) was larger than that of pN stage (AUC =0.621) in prediction of 3-year OS, however LODDS were smaller in prediction of 5-year OS (AUC =0.620, 0.631, respectively), and the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05 all). Lastly, the step analysis identified the best cut-off point for LODDS as -1.2 that is significantly associated with the prognosis of the node-negative patients (P=0.024), and the ROC analysis also indicated that a cut-off value of -1.2 for LODDS provided the highest sensitivity and specificity interestingly.
CONCLUSIONS: LODDS may be suitable for evaluation of OS in advanced ESCC patients without LN metastasis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS); esophagus neophagus; prognosis

Year:  2017        PMID: 28616267      PMCID: PMC5465161          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  22 in total

1.  Geographical distribution and racial disparity in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Allan Pickens; Mark B Orringer
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Can lymph node ratio replace pn categories in the tumor-node-metastasis classification system for esophageal cancer?

Authors:  Zihui Tan; Guowei Ma; Haoxian Yang; Lanjun Zhang; Tiehua Rong; Peng Lin
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  Log odds of positive lymph nodes: a novel prognostic indicator superior to the number-based and the ratio-based N category for gastric cancer patients with R0 resection.

Authors:  Zhe Sun; Yan Xu; De Ming Li; Zhen Ning Wang; Guo Lian Zhu; Bao Jun Huang; Kai Li; Hui Mian Xu
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  The assessment of prognosis of surgically resected oesophageal cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined pathologically.

Authors:  Christopher P Twine; Wyn G Lewis; Matthew A Morgan; David Chan; Geoffrey W B Clark; Tim Havard; Tom D Crosby; S Ashley Roberts; Geriant T Williams
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Prognostic assessment of different lymph node staging methods for pancreatic cancer with R0 resection: pN staging, lymph node ratio, log odds of positive lymph nodes.

Authors:  Marco La Torre; Giuseppe Nigri; Niccolò Petrucciani; Marco Cavallini; Paolo Aurello; Giulia Cosenza; Genoveffa Balducci; Vincenzo Ziparo; Giovanni Ramacciato
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.996

6.  The prognostic impact of the log odds of positive lymph nodes in colon cancer.

Authors:  N C Arslan; S Sokmen; A E Canda; C Terzi; S Sarioglu
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: data-driven staging for the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Cancer Staging Manuals.

Authors:  Thomas W Rice; Valerie W Rusch; Hemant Ishwaran; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Prognostic value of different lymph node staging methods in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy.

Authors:  San-Gang Wu; Feng-Yan Li; Juan Zhou; Qin Lin; Jia-Yuan Sun; Huan-Xin Lin; Xun-Xing Guan; Zhen-Yu He
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  The tumor-log odds of positive lymph nodes-metastasis staging system, a promising new staging system for gastric cancer after D2 resection in China.

Authors:  Miao-zhen Qiu; Hui-juan Qiu; Zhi-qiang Wang; Chao Ren; De-shen Wang; Dong-sheng Zhang; Hui-yan Luo; Yu-hong Li; Rui-hua Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy using the log odds of positive lymph nodes.

Authors:  San-Gang Wu; Jia-Yuan Sun; Li-Chao Yang; Juan Zhou; Feng-Yan Li; Qun Li; Huan-Xin Lin; Qin Lin; Zhen-Yu He
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-11-03
View more
  7 in total

1.  Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a better prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma than N stage.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Shu-Geng Gao; Qi Xue; Feng-Wei Tan; Yu-Shun Gao; You-Sheng Mao; Da-Li Wang; Jun Zhao; Yin Li; Xiang-Yang Yu; Hong Cheng; Chen-Guang Zhao; Ju-Wei Mu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  The Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio as a New Predictor of All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Yue Yu; Yu Liu; Xinyu Ling; Renhong Huang; Suyu Wang; Jie Min; Jian Xiao; Yufeng Zhang; Zhinong Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Prognostic Performance of Alternative Lymph Node Classification Systems for Patients with Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A Single Center Cohort Study.

Authors:  Dimitrios Prassas; Aristodemos Kounnamas; Kenko Cupisti; Matthias Schott; Wolfram Trudo Knoefel; Andreas Krieg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  N, LNR or LODDS: Which Is the Most Appropriate Lymph Node Classification Scheme for Patients with Radically Resected Pancreatic Cancer?

Authors:  Dimitrios Prassas; Sami Alexander Safi; Maria Chara Stylianidi; Leila Anne Telan; Sarah Krieg; Christoph Roderburg; Irene Esposito; Tom Luedde; Wolfram Trudo Knoefel; Andreas Krieg
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Comparison of Different Lymph Node Staging Schemes for Predicting Survival Outcomes in Node-Positive Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Xi-Lin Yang; Nan Huang; Ming-Ming Wang; Hua Lai; Da-Jun Wu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-09

6.  Prognostic value of log odds of positive lymph nodes in node-positive lung squamous cell carcinoma patients after surgery: a SEER population-based study.

Authors:  Yue Yu; Peng Zhang; Renqi Yao; Junnan Wang; Pei Wang; Xiaofei Xue; Jian Xiao; Zhinong Wang
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08

7.  Comparison of three lymph node staging systems in evaluating the prognosis of patients with pT3 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Di-Tian Liu; Lin-Shuo Wang; Yu-Ping Chen; Shao-Bin Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.