Literature DB >> 28616106

The role of preoperative urodynamics in stress urinary incontinence surgery.

Duane R Hickling1, Stephen S Steele2.   

Abstract

The routine use of urodynamics prior to incontinence surgery continues to be debated. The evidence available from randomized, control trials suggests that preoperative urodynamics do not improve surgical outcomes and are not cost-effective.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID： 28616106      PMCID： PMC5461139          DOI： 10.5489/cuaj.4581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN： 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  12 in total

1.  Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence.

Authors:  Holly E Richter; Michael E Albo; Halina M Zyczynski; Kimberly Kenton; Peggy A Norton; Larry T Sirls; Stephen R Kraus; Toby C Chai; Gary E Lemack; Kimberly J Dandreo; R Edward Varner; Shawn Menefee; Chiara Ghetti; Linda Brubaker; Ingrid Nygaard; Salil Khandwala; Thomas A Rozanski; Harry Johnson; Joseph Schaffer; Anne M Stoddard; Robert L Holley; Charles W Nager; Pamela Moalli; Elizabeth Mueller; Amy M Arisco; Marlene Corton; Sharon Tennstedt; T Debuene Chang; E Ann Gormley; Heather J Litman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling.

Authors:  Gary E Lemack; Stephen Krauss; Heather Litman; Mary Pat FitzGerald; Toby Chai; Charles Nager; Larry Sirls; Halina Zyczynski; Jan Baker; Keith Lloyd; W D Steers
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Meta-analysis of the relationship between asymptomatic bacteriuria and preterm delivery/low birth weight.

Authors:  R Romero; E Oyarzun; M Mazor; M Sirtori; J C Hobbins; M Bracken
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery.

Authors:  Charles W Nager; Linda Brubaker; Heather J Litman; Halina M Zyczynski; R Edward Varner; Cindy Amundsen; Larry T Sirls; Peggy A Norton; Amy M Arisco; Toby C Chai; Philippe Zimmern; Matthew D Barber; Kimberly J Dandreo; Shawn A Menefee; Kimberly Kenton; Jerry Lowder; Holly E Richter; Salil Khandwala; Ingrid Nygaard; Stephen R Kraus; Harry W Johnson; Gary E Lemack; Marina Mihova; Michael E Albo; Elizabeth Mueller; Gary Sutkin; Tracey S Wilson; Yvonne Hsu; Thomas A Rozanski; Leslie M Rickey; David Rahn; Sharon Tennstedt; John W Kusek; E Ann Gormley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Can preoperative urodynamic investigation be omitted in women with stress urinary incontinence? A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S A L van Leijsen; K B Kluivers; B W J Mol; S R Broekhuis; A L Milani; M Y Bongers; C I M Aalders; V Dietz; G G A Malmberg; M E Vierhout; J P F A Heesakkers
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 2.696

6.  The cost of preoperative urodynamics: A secondary analysis of the ValUE trial.

Authors:  Peggy A Norton; Charles W Nager; Linda Brubaker; Gary E Lemack; Larry T Sirls; Robert Holley; Toby C Chai; Stephen R Kraus; Halina Zyczynski; Bridget Smith; Anne Stoddard
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 2.696

7.  Urodynamic studies in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline.

Authors:  J Christian Winters; Roger R Dmochowski; Howard B Goldman; C D Anthony Herndon; Kathleen C Kobashi; Stephen R Kraus; Gary E Lemack; Victor W Nitti; Eric S Rovner; Alan J Wein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Prophylactic antibiotics to reduce the risk of urinary tract infections after urodynamic studies.

Authors:  Richard Foon; Philip Toozs-Hobson; Pallavi Latthe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-10-17

9.  Urodynamic measures do not predict stress continence outcomes after surgery for stress urinary incontinence in selected women.

Authors:  Charles W Nager; MaryPat FitzGerald; Stephen R Kraus; Toby C Chai; Halina Zyczynski; Larry Sirls; Gary E Lemack; L Keith Lloyd; Heather J Litman; Anne M Stoddard; Jan Baker; William Steers
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Does preoperative urodynamics improve outcomes for women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Rachaneni; P Latthe
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 6.531
View more
  3 in total

1.  Can conventional urodynamic variables help to predict the necessity of overactive bladder symptomatic therapy in women after transobturator tape surgery?

Authors:  Zane Pilsetniece; Egils Vjaters
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2020-09-08

2.  Vaginal Pessaries for Pelvic Organ Prolapse or Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2021-05-06

3.  Present value of the Urethral mobility test as a tool to assess Stress urinary incontinence due to Intrinsic sphincteric deficiency.

Authors:  Daniela Robledo; Laura Zuluaga; Alejandra Bravo-Balado; Cristina Domínguez; Carlos Gustavo Trujillo; Juan Ignacio Caicedo; Martín Rondón; Julián Azuero; Mauricio Plata
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.