Literature DB >> 28615822

A new method of salvaging nipple projection after secondary nipple reconstruction using locoregional flap.

Fabrizio De Biasio1, Nicola Zingaretti1, Sebastiano Mura1, Alessandra Fin1, Michele Riccio2, Pier Camillo Parodi1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28615822      PMCID: PMC5469219          DOI: 10.4103/ijps.IJPS_47_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg        ISSN: 0970-0358


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, The most important features of a natural reconstructed nipple are symmetry and a durable valid vertical projection. A frequent drawback of the methods currently used for nipple reconstruction is the loss of nipple projection in the longer post-operative term. Although numerous nipple-areolar complex reconstruction techniques have been described,[123] common among these techniques is a failure to maintain a nipple projection over time (estimated at 17%–75%), and difficulties related to maintenance of nipple projection have been well documented.[4] As proposed by Caterson et al. for nipple-areolar projection,[1] we present a surgical technique that uses a purse-string to increase nipple projection. Our surgical procedure is carried out under local anaesthesia (mepivacaine 2%); first, using the contralateral nipple diameter as a template, we made 6–8 small triangular skin incisions with an 11 blade scalpel; the incision of each triangle's base is equally spaced 2 mm outside the desired nipple diameter. These triangle-shaped areas are deepithelialised; then, through an incision site, a purse-string suture (cervical visor-3 Gore-Tex) on a straight needle is subsequently inserted and continued through all the incisions and is placed within the deep dermis [Figure 1]. This suture material is uniquely suited due to the following property: it is strong and permanent, and it slides very easily through the tough dermal layer. Gentle traction is applied until there is good projection, and the purse-string suture is tied under moderate tension. The wounds are closed in double layers.
Figure 1

Schematic drawings of the operation. (a) 6–8 small triangular skin incisions are evenly spaced (with the base of each triangle approximately 2 mm outside the desired nipple diameter) with an 11 blade scalpel; these triangle-shaped areas are deepithelialised; (b) Purse-string suture used to form an internal supporting ring and it is tied under moderate tension; (c) the nipple access sites are closed with 5-0 monocryl and 6-0 nylon

Schematic drawings of the operation. (a) 6–8 small triangular skin incisions are evenly spaced (with the base of each triangle approximately 2 mm outside the desired nipple diameter) with an 11 blade scalpel; these triangle-shaped areas are deepithelialised; (b) Purse-string suture used to form an internal supporting ring and it is tied under moderate tension; (c) the nipple access sites are closed with 5-0 monocryl and 6-0 nylon A ‘donut’ dressing is applied to avoid compression of the nipple for 4 months postoperatively. In our clinic, this method was used with nine women (one bilateral case and eight unilateral cases of loss of nipple projection). They were no cases of infection, nipple ischaemia or other complications. No permanent sutures required removal for infection or exposure. Our experience using this technique has provided a stable projection of the nipple with at least 1-year follow-up represented in pre- and post-operative photographs, as shown in Figure 2. There were no deformities of the nipples or the areolas after this procedure and no decrease in the nipples or areolas size; the triangular vertical skin excisions around the nipple avoid the skin excess during the nipple lift.
Figure 2

A 48-year-old patient underwent right mastectomy and implant reconstruction 5 years ago. After 1 year, the nipple is reconstructed using a cervical visor flap. (a) In these pre-operative images, we can see the loss of nipple projection; (b) Post-operative images at 12 months, note good nipple projection and minimal scar; (c) Intraoperative view: a purse-string suture is subsequently inserted and continued through all the incisions; (d) Intraoperative view: the purse-string suture is tied under moderate tension

A 48-year-old patient underwent right mastectomy and implant reconstruction 5 years ago. After 1 year, the nipple is reconstructed using a cervical visor flap. (a) In these pre-operative images, we can see the loss of nipple projection; (b) Post-operative images at 12 months, note good nipple projection and minimal scar; (c) Intraoperative view: a purse-string suture is subsequently inserted and continued through all the incisions; (d) Intraoperative view: the purse-string suture is tied under moderate tension This method is very simple in concept and procedure without a complicated design; it does not require another donor region or advanced skill. This procedure is a speedy and reliable method for restoring the loss of nipple projection.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  4 in total

1.  Nipple reconstruction using the fleur-de-lis flap technique.

Authors:  D Germanò; F De Biasio; A Piedimonte; P C Parodi
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Long-term predictable nipple projection following reconstruction.

Authors:  J W Few; J R Marcus; L A Casas; M E Aitken; J Redding
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  A modified technique for nipple-areola complex reconstruction.

Authors:  Shoeib A Mohamed; Peir Camillo Parodi
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2011-01

4.  Reconstruction of Areolar Projection Using a Purse-String Suture Technique.

Authors:  Stephanie A Caterson; Mansher Singh; Simon G Talbot; Elof Eriksson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.