| Literature DB >> 28615734 |
Hongmiao Wu1,2, Linkun Wu1,2, Quan Zhu1,2, Juanying Wang1,2, Xianjin Qin2,3, Jiahui Xu1,2, Lufei Kong1,2, Jun Chen1,2, Sheng Lin1,2, Muhammad Umar Khan1,2, Hira Amjad1,2, Wenxiong Lin4,5,6.
Abstract
A three-year field monoculture trial of Radix pseudostellariae and complementary laboratory studies were conducted to further elucidate the underlying mechanism responsible for significant decreases in the biomass yield and quality of R. pseudostellariae under continuous monoculture regimes. HPLC analysis indicated that continuous monoculture soil was rich in organic acids, which had cumulative effects over time. Further analysis suggested that the application of a mixture of organic acids significantly promoted growth of pathogenic fungi, and increased the expression of chemotaxis-related gene (cheA) and biofilm formation of the specific pathogenic Kosakonia sacchari. However, opposite reactions were observed in the case of Bacillus megaterium and Bacillus pumilus. Concurrently, the present results revealed that the mixed organic acids stimulated the production of toxins, as well as H2O2 in the pathogenic fungi. Furthermore, the presence of organic acids reflecting environmental conditions under monocropping had negative effects on the expression of the biocontrol-related genes, which resulted in attenuated antagonistic activities of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) to suppress mycelial growth of the pathogenic fungi. These results help to unveil the mechanisms associated with how accumulated organic acids differentially mediate deterioration of soil microbial composition and structure in monocropping system.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28615734 PMCID: PMC5471291 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03793-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Photographs of above and below ground components of Radix pseudostellariae under one-year and two-year consecutive monoculture. (A) newly planted R. pseudostellariae, (B) two-year monocultured R. pseudostellariae.
Figure 2Changes in the content of organic acids in the rhizosphere soil of R. pseudostellariae sampled at different growth stages in a continuous cropping system. CK represents the control with no R. pseudostellariae cultivation. FY, SY, and TY represent the newly planted, two-year and three-year monocultured R. pseudostellariae, respectively, grown in fields.
Figure 3The total bacterial and fungal populations in R. pseudostellariae rhizosphere soil under different years of monoculture. A represents the contents of bacteria and fungi; B represents the ratios of fungi to bacteria. CK represents the control with no R. pseudostellariae cultivation. FY, SY, and TY represent the newly planted, two-year and three-year monocultured R. pseudostellariae, respectively, grown in fields. SS represents the soil around the pathogenic site of R. pseudostellariae. These soils were sampled from the rhizosphere soil of the fields at the same time during the later tuberous root stage of R. pseudostellariae. Columns with different letters are statistically different (LSD test, p < 0.05).
Figure 4The effects of organic acid mixtures on toxin production by T. helicus. A represents 3A-DON; B represents 15A-DON. Columns with different letters are statistically different (LSD test, p < 0.05).
Figure 5The effects of different organic acids at 120 μmol/L on hydrogen peroxide production by the fungi. (A) represents F. oxysporum; (B) represents T. helicus; (C) represents F. moniliforme. Columns with different letters are statistically different (LSD test, p < 0.05).
Figure 6Chemotactic response of the bacteria towards the mixture of detected organic acids at different concentrations evaluated by capillary assay. Columns with different letters are statistically different (LSD test, p < 0.05).
Figure 7The effects of the mixed organic acids on the cheA gene transcription in the studied bacteria. Columns with different letters are statistically different (LSD test, p < 0.05).
Figure 8The effects of the mixed organic acids at different concentrations on biofilm formation of the bacteria. Columns with different letters are statistically different (LSD test, p < 0.05).
Figure 9The effects of the organic acids on the transcription of biocontrol genes in bacteria evaluated by qRT-PCR.
Figure 10Tentative graphic of the communication between root exudates and microorganisms.