D S Prasad1, Zubair Kabir2, J P Suganthy3, A K Dash4, B C Das5. 1. Sudhir Heart Centre, Berhampur, Odisha, India. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. 3. Australian Medical Research Foundation Ltd; Fresh Start Recovery Programme, Perth, WA, Australia. 4. MKCG Medical College, Berhampur, Odisha, India. 5. Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: South Asians show an elevated cardiometabolic risk compared to Caucasians. They are clinically metabolically obese but are considered normal weight based on current international cut-off levels of several anthropometric indices. This study has two main objectives: (i) to predict the most sensitive anthropometric measures for commonly studied cardiometabolic risk factors, and (ii) to determine optimal cut-off levels of each of the anthropometric indices in relation to these cardiometabolic risk factors in South Asians. METHODS: The study was conducted on a random sample of 1178 adults of 20-80 years of age from an urban population of eastern India. Obesity, as evaluated by standard anthropometric indices of BMI (body mass index), WC (waist circumference), WHpR (waist-to-hip ratio) and WHtR (waist-to-height ratio), was individually correlated with cardiometabolic risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed which includes: (i) the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis to assess the predictive validity of each cardiometabolic risk factor; and (ii) Youden index to determine optimal cut-off levels of each of the anthropometric indices. RESULTS: Overall, AUROC values for WHtR were the highest, but showed variations within the sexes for each of the cardiometabolic risk factors studied. Further, WHpR cut-offs were higher for men (0.93-0.95) than women (0.85-0.88). WC cut-offs were 84.5-89.5 cm in men and 77.5-82.0 cm in women. For both sexes the optimal WHtR cut-off value was 0.51-0.55. The optimal BMI cut-offs were 23.4-24.2 kg/m2 in men and 23.6-25.3 kg/m2 in women. CONCLUSION: WHtR may be a better anthropometric marker of cardiometabolic risks in South Asian adults than BMI, WC or WHpR.
BACKGROUND: South Asians show an elevated cardiometabolic risk compared to Caucasians. They are clinically metabolically obese but are considered normal weight based on current international cut-off levels of several anthropometric indices. This study has two main objectives: (i) to predict the most sensitive anthropometric measures for commonly studied cardiometabolic risk factors, and (ii) to determine optimal cut-off levels of each of the anthropometric indices in relation to these cardiometabolic risk factors in South Asians. METHODS: The study was conducted on a random sample of 1178 adults of 20-80 years of age from an urban population of eastern India. Obesity, as evaluated by standard anthropometric indices of BMI (body mass index), WC (waist circumference), WHpR (waist-to-hip ratio) and WHtR (waist-to-height ratio), was individually correlated with cardiometabolic risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed which includes: (i) the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis to assess the predictive validity of each cardiometabolic risk factor; and (ii) Youden index to determine optimal cut-off levels of each of the anthropometric indices. RESULTS: Overall, AUROC values for WHtR were the highest, but showed variations within the sexes for each of the cardiometabolic risk factors studied. Further, WHpR cut-offs were higher for men (0.93-0.95) than women (0.85-0.88). WC cut-offs were 84.5-89.5 cm in men and 77.5-82.0 cm in women. For both sexes the optimal WHtR cut-off value was 0.51-0.55. The optimal BMI cut-offs were 23.4-24.2 kg/m2 in men and 23.6-25.3 kg/m2 in women. CONCLUSION: WHtR may be a better anthropometric marker of cardiometabolic risks in South Asian adults than BMI, WC or WHpR.