Literature DB >> 28615391

Practical approach to evaluating testicular status in infants and children.

Elke E Mau1, Michael P Leonard2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the differences between normal, retractile, ectopic, ascended, and undescended testes and to describe the optimal way to perform a testicular examination to distinguish one from the other, as well as to demonstrate that ultrasound imaging is not necessary and to clarify when to consider specialist referral. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: This paper is based on selected findings from a MEDLINE search on undescended testes and orchiopexy referrals, and on our experience at the Urology Clinic at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario in Ottawa, including review of referrals to our clinic for undescended testes and the resultant findings of normal variants versus surgical cases. The MeSH headings used in our MEDLINE search included undescended testicle, retractile testicle, ectopic testicle, ascended testicle, referral and consultation, and orchiopexy. MAIN MESSAGE: An undescended testis is defined as the true absence of one testis (or both testes) from normal scrotal position. Ectopic and ascended testes will likewise be absent from the scrotum, the latter having been present at one point in development. Differentiating among testicular examination findings is important, as descended and retractile testes are managed conservatively, while prompt surgical intervention should be offered for ascended, ectopic, and undescended testes. Uncertainty surrounding the diagnosis of an undescended testis causes anxiety, might lead to unwarranted imaging, and might increase the wait list for specialty assessment. For this reason, avoidance of ultrasound in the evaluation of undescended testes was included in the recent Choosing Wisely Canada campaign. We seek to clarify the physical examination findings in the evaluation of possible undescended testes, the suggested referral parameters, and the subsequent management.
CONCLUSION: Undescended testes and their variants are common. As decision for referral is based on the primary care physician's physical examination findings, we clarify distinguishing between normal and abnormal findings on testicular examination to aid in appropriate referral for subspecialist evaluation. Consultation, if needed, should be sought at 6 months' corrected gestational age, or at detection if later than 6 months, without delay for ultrasound imaging, as surgical management is recommended for those patients with undescended, ectopic, or ascended testes. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28615391      PMCID: PMC5471079     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  7 in total

Review 1.  Retractile testes: a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Charles Keys; Yves Heloury
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 1.830

2.  Current referral patterns and means to improve accuracy in diagnosis of undescended testis.

Authors:  Warren Snodgrass; Nicol Bush; Michael Holzer; Song Zhang
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  Regulation of testicular descent.

Authors:  John M Hutson; Ruili Li; Bridget R Southwell; Don Newgreen; Mary Cousinery
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 4.  The frequency of undescended testis from birth to adulthood: a review.

Authors:  K Sijstermans; W W M Hack; R W Meijer; L M van der Voort-Doedens
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2007-05-03

5.  Retractile testis--is it really a normal variant?

Authors:  Piyush K Agarwal; Mireya Diaz; Jack S Elder
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Inappropriate Use of Ultrasound in Management of Pediatric Cryptorchidism.

Authors:  Niki Kanaroglou; Teresa To; Jingqin Zhu; Luis H P Braga; Elias Wehbi; Mohammed Hajiha; Darius J Bägli; Joao Pippi Salle; Martin A Koyle; Armando J Lorenzo
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Medical students' experiences learning intimate physical examination skills: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Andra M Dabson; Parker J Magin; Gaynor Heading; Dimity Pond
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of Undescended Testes in Newborns: It Is Really Simple, Just Not Easy.

Authors:  Martin Promm; Annika Dittrich; Susanne Brandstetter; Sara Fill-Malfertheiner; Michael Melter; Birgit Seelbach-Göbel; Christian Apfelbacher; Michael Kabesch; Wolfgang H Rösch
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.089

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.