Literature DB >> 28615121

Implications of the getting it right first time initiative for regional knee arthroplasty services.

Richard Barksfield1, James Murray2, James Robinson2, Andrew Porteous2.   

Abstract

STUDY AIM: The aim of this case study of regional orthopaedic practice was to estimate the potential impact of the GIRFT recommendations (iGIRFT) of minimum unit and surgeon specific volumes to orthopaedic units within the Severn Region, UK.
METHOD: Practice profiles for surgeons and units were generated using the UK National Joint Registry Surgeon and Hospital Profile Database. Minimum volume thresholds were set at 13 procedures/year for surgeons and 30 procedures/year for units.
RESULTS: Five thousand five hundred seventeen knee arthroplasty procedures were recorded within the Severn Region between 1st of January and 31st December 2012 and these were performed by 94 surgeons in 18units. During this time, 4232 (76.7%) primary TKR, 751 (13.6%) primary UKR, 97 (1.7%) primary PFJR and 437 (7.9%) revision TKR were performed. Median surgeon volumes were 33 (range two to 180) for primary TKR, ten (range 2 to 64) for UKR, two (range two to 41) for PFJR and five (range two to 57) for Revision TKR. Amongst 48 surgeons performing UKR, 26 (54%) performed less than 13 procedures per year accounting for 108 (14%) procedures. Amongst 20 surgeons performing PFJR, 19 (95%) performed <13/year, accounting for 56 (58%) of cases. Fifty surgeons performed revision TKR with 37 (74%) performing <13 revisions per annum, accounting for 151 (35%) procedures. Amongst 16units performing UKR, eight (50%) performed <30/year, accounting for 16% overall. Revision TKR was performed in 15units whilst eight (53%) performed <30/year, accounting for 62 (15%) cases.
CONCLUSION: We have hypothesised the impact of implementing minimum unit and surgeon volume thresholds for the organisation of regional arthroplasty services. Our analysis suggests that whilst these effects may be considerable, they may be mitigated by local rationalisation to achieve an appropriate caseload mix.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GIRFT; Knee arthroplasty; Surgeon volume; Unit volume

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28615121     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  2 in total

1.  Am I the right surgeon, in the right hospital, with the right equipment and staff to do this operation?

Authors:  Jonathan R A Phillips; Andrew D Toms; Roland Becker; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Does Hypothetical Centralization of Revision THA and TKA Exacerbate Existing Geographic or Demographic Disparities in Access to Care by Increased Patient Travel Distances or Times? A Large-database Study.

Authors:  Gabriel Ramirez; Thomas G Myers; Caroline P Thirukumaran; Benjamin F Ricciardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 4.755

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.