| Literature DB >> 28615013 |
Ling-Jun Li1,2, Ecosse Lamoureux3,4, Tien Yin Wong3,4, Ngee Lek4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Poor glycemic control in Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) patients is strongly associated with an increased risk of diabetes-related microvascular complications later in life, but it is unclear whether short period of poor glycemic control in children with T1D can cause evident microvascular morphological changes long before any pathological manifestation. Our study aimed to investigate the longitudinal association between poor glycemic control and subsequent changes in retinal microvasculature, in a pilot study of 55 pediatric T1D patients from Singapore after a one-year follow-up.Entities:
Keywords: Children; Glycemic control; Retinal microvascular changes; Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28615013 PMCID: PMC5471853 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-017-0449-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
Comparisons of clinical characteristics between T1D pediatric patients with good and poor glycemic control
| Good glycemic control | Poor glycemic control |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
| mean, SD or n, % | mean, SD or n, % | ||
| Baseline characteristics, | |||
| Age, years | 13.3, 1.9 | 13.0, 1.8 | 0.45 |
| Sex, male | 14, 51.9% | 11, 39.3% | 0.35 |
| Ethnicity, | |||
| Chinese | 20, 74.1% | 13, 46.4% | 0.05 |
| Malay | 2, 7.4% | 9, 32.1% | |
| Indian | 5, 18.5% | 6, 21.4% | |
| Duration of diagnosis, years | 4.17, 3.8 | 5.64, 3.1 | 0.12 |
| Anthropometric measures, | |||
| SBP, mmHg | 106.2, 10.8 | 104.6, 11.2 | 0.85 |
| DBP, mmHg | 64.9, 7.1 | 61.7 5.8 | 0.10 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 19.4, 3.2 | 20.4, 2.9 | 0.25 |
| Serum biomarkers, | |||
| LDL, mmol/L | 2.9, 0.9 | 3.1, 0.9 | 0.49 |
| uACR, mg/g | 1.4, 1.8 | 1.0, 0.8 | 0.60 |
| Retinal vascular parameters | |||
| Retinal arterioles, | |||
| Caliber, μm | 133.8, 10.6 | 139.8, 9.5 |
|
| Fractal dimension, Df | 1.22, 0.05 | 1.21, 0.06 | 0.24 |
| Branching angle, D | 78.3, 14.7 | 85.8, 11.8 |
|
| Curvature Tortuosity, unit | 9.1E-5, 1.7E-5 | 9.8E-5, 2.5E-5 | 0.27 |
| Retinal venules, | |||
| Caliber, μm | 188.2, 13.1 | 196.3, 22.3 | 0.11 |
| Fractal dimension, Df | 1.22, 0.04 | 1.20, 0.04 | 0.11 |
| Branching angle, D | 77.7, 10.9 | 77.1, 9.8 | 0.85 |
| Curvature Tortuosity, unit | 9.4E-5, 1.7E-5 | 9.5E-5, 1.5E-5 | 0.81 |
*student t-test, χ2 test or fisher exact test.
Abbreviation: SD standard deviation, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, BMI body mass index, LDL low-density cholesterol lipoprotein, uACR Urine albumin to creatinine ratio
Association between poor glycemic control and retinal microvascular parameters in T1D pediatric patients
| Retinal arteriolar caliber, μm Difference in β (95% CI) | Retinal arteriolar branching angle, degree Difference in β (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Good glycemic control | Reference | Reference |
| Poor glycemic control | ||
| Model 1 |
|
|
| Model 2 | 5.3 (−0.5, 11.1) |
|
| Model 3 | 6.3 (−0.3, 12.9) |
|
| Model 4 | 6.0 (−0.9, 12.8) |
|
Model 1, unadjusted.
Model 2, adjusted for ethnicity.
Model 3, Model 2 and additionally adjusted for BMI and LDL at baseline.
Model 4, Model 3 and additionally adjusted for duration of T1D diagnosis.
Fig. 1Retinal images of a T1D patient with poor glycemic control and a T1D patient with good glycemic control. Comparison of retinal arteriolar caliber and retinal arteriolar branching angle between patient with poor glycemic control (a) and patient with good glycemic control (b). Blue arrows are pointing to the width of retinal arterioles while red angles are indicating retinal arteriolar branching angle. The patient with poor glycemic control had a wider average retinal arteriolar caliber (147.8 vs. 112.3 μm) and a larger average retinal arteriolar branching angle (110.4 vs. 90.0°) than the patient with good glycemic control