| Literature DB >> 28614916 |
Borim An1, Eunbi Kim1, Haengseok Song2, Kwon-Soo Ha3, Eun-Taek Han4, Won Sun Park5, Tae Gyu Ahn6, Se-Ran Yang7, Sunghun Na6, Seok-Ho Hong1.
Abstract
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), one of the common metabolic disorders of pregnancy, leads to functional alterations in various cells including stem cells as well as some abnormalities in fetal development. Perivascular stem cells (PVCs) have gained more attention in recent years, for the treatment of various diseases. However, the effect of GDM on PVC function has not been investigated. In our study, we isolated PVCs from umbilical cord of normal pregnant women and GDM patients and compared their phenotypes and function. There is no significant difference in phenotypic expression, response to bFGF exposure and adipogenic differentiation capacity between normal (N)-PVCs and GDM-PVCs. However, when compared with N-PVCs, early passage GDM-PVCs displayed decreased initial rates of cell yield and proliferation as well as a reduced ability to promote wound closure. These results suggest that maternal metabolic dysregulation during gestation can alter the function of endogenous multipotent stem cells, which may impact their therapeutic effectiveness.Entities:
Keywords: differentiation; gestational diabetes mellitus; peri-vascular stem cells; proliferation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28614916 PMCID: PMC5523020 DOI: 10.14348/molcells.2017.0053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Cells ISSN: 1016-8478 Impact factor: 5.034
Donor demographics
| Parameters | Normal (n = 15) | GDM (n = 15) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donor ages (years) | 33 ± 0.91 | 34.33 ± 0.74 | 0.302 |
| Gestational period (weeks) | 38.75 ± 0.2 | 37.93 ± 0.45 | 0.097 |
| 1 min Apgar score | 7.33 ± 0.15 | 7.25 ± 0.13 | 0.699 |
| 5 min Apgar score | 8.9 ± 0.06 | 9 | 0.381 |
| Birth weight (kg) | 3.15 ± 0.1 | 3.13 ± 0.14 | 0.942 |
| Maternal medical problems | n.d. | n.d. | |
| Congenital fetal anomaly | n.d. | n.d. |
n.d. not detected
Fig. 1Isolation and phenotypic characterization of HUCPVCs.
(A) Bright field images of HUCPVCs obtained from healthy and GDM patients. Arrow indicates dissected vessel from HUC. Scale bars. 500 μm. (B) Average number of harvested PVCs per centimeter of vessel length. (C, D) Representative flow cytometry dot plots and histograms for comparing phenotypes between N-PVCs and GDM-PVCs. Frequencies indicate average and SD. Error bars indicate SD.
Fig. 2Comparison of proliferative capacity between N-PVCs and GDM-PVCs.
(A) Population doubling time (PDT) of HUCPVCs (n = 5) from passage 1 (p1) to p8. (B) Comparison of cell cycle compartments between N-PVCs and GDM-PVCs (passage 4) using BrdU incorporation assay (n = 5). (C) Accumulated cell numbers of HUCPVCs (n = 5) from p1 to p9. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Error bars indicate SD.
Fig. 3Supplementation of bFGF promotes the proliferation of N-PVCs and GDM-PVCs.
(A) Representative images of N-PVC and GDM-PVC cultured in the presence or absence of bFGF for 4 days. Scale bars. 500 μm. (B) N-PVCs (black bars) and GDM-PVCs (gray bars) at passage 4 were plated at a density of 4 × 104 cells and treated with 20 ng/ml of bFGF for 4 days. (C) Changes of cell cycle compartments by bFGF treatment were estimated by BrdU incorporation assay. *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. Error bars indicate SD.
Fig. 4Comparison of in vitro regeneration potential between N-PVCs and GDM-PVCs.
(A) Representative images of Oil Red O and Alizarin Red S staining for adipocytes and osteocytes. Scale bars. 500 μm. (B) Measurements of Oil Red O and Alizarin Red S contents using spectrophotometry. (C) Representative images were captured by microscope and analyzed using ImageJ software at 0 and 12 h. Scale bars. 500 μm. (D) Percentage of uncovered wound area from BEAS-2B cell monolayers treated with N-PVC-CM and GDM-PVC-CM for 12 h. **p < 0.01. Error bars indicate SD.