Literature DB >> 28614895

Endocuff-assisted vs. standard colonoscopy in the fecal occult blood test-based UK Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (E-cap study): a randomized trial.

Rupam Bhattacharyya1,2, Fergus Chedgy1,2, Kesavan Kandiah1,2, Carole Fogg2, Bernard Higgins2, Ben Haysom-Newport1, Lisa Gadeke1, Fergus Thursby-Pelham1, Richard Ellis1, Patrick Goggin1, Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton1, Pradeep Bhandari1.   

Abstract

Background and study aims Up to 25 % colorectal adenomas are missed during colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the endocuff could improve polyp detection in an organized bowel cancer screening program (BCSP). Patients and methods This parallel group, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial included patients with positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) who were attending for BCSP colonoscopy. The primary outcome was the number of polyps per patient. Secondary outcomes included the number of adenomas per patient, adenoma and polyp detection rates, and withdrawal times. Results A total of 534 BCSP patients were randomized to endocuff-assisted or standard colonoscopy. The mean age was 67 years and the male to female ratio was 1.8:1. We detected no significant difference in the number of polyps per patient (standard 1.8, endocuff 1.6; P = 0.44), adenomas per patient (standard 1.4, endocuff 1.3; P = 0.54), polyp detection rate (standard 69.8 %, endocuff 70.3 %; P = 0.93), adenoma detection rate (standard 63.0 %, endocuff 60.9 %; P = 0.85), advanced adenoma detection rate (standard 18.5 %, endocuff 16.9 %; P = 0.81), and cancer detection rate (standard 5.7 %, endocuff 5.3 %; P = 0.85). The mean withdrawal time was significantly shorter among patients in the endocuff group compared with the standard colonoscopy group (16.9 vs. 19.5 minutes; P < 0.005). The endocuff had to be removed in 17/266 patients (6.4 %) because of inability to pass through the sigmoid colon. Conclusions This study did not find improved polyp or adenoma detection with endocuff-assisted colonoscopy in the FOBT-positive BCSP population. A shorter withdrawal time with endocuff may reflect improved views and stability provided by the endocuff.Trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02529007). © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28614895     DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-111718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  13 in total

1.  Editorial: Cuff- and cap-assisted colonoscopy: More questions than answers.

Authors:  Marcus Hollenbach; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Adenoma and Advanced Adenoma Detection Rates of Water Exchange, Endocuff, and Cap Colonoscopy: A Network Meta-Analysis with Pooled Data of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Paul P Shao; Aileen Bui; Tahmineh Romero; Hui Jia; Felix W Leung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  The Role of Behind Folds Visualizing Techniques and Technologies in Improving Adenoma Detection Rate.

Authors:  K E van Keulen; E Soons; P D Siersema
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09

Review 4.  Endocuff-assisted versus standard colonoscopy for improving adenoma detection rate: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  J Wang; C Ye; S Fei
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.699

Review 5.  Colonoscopy attachments for the detection of precancerous lesions during colonoscopy: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Georgios Tziatzios; Eleftherios Spartalis; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Wee Sing Ngu; Roisin Bevan; Zacharias P Tsiamoulos; Paul Bassett; Zoë Hoare; Matthew D Rutter; Gayle Clifford; Nicola Totton; Thomas J Lee; Arvind Ramadas; John G Silcock; John Painter; Laura J Neilson; Brian P Saunders; Colin J Rees
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Effect of Endocuff use on colonoscopy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Georgios Tziatzios; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Lorenzo Fuccio; Cesare Hassan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Can technology increase adenoma detection rate?

Authors:  Wee Sing Ngu; Colin Rees
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.409

9.  The impact of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection in an organized screening program.

Authors:  Lucas G Cavallaro; Cesare Hassan; Pierenrico Lecis; Ermenegildo Galliani; Elisabetta Dal Pont; Paolo Iuzzolino; Claudia Roldo; Fabio Soppelsa; Bastianello Germanà
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-03-29

10.  Comparison of colon adenoma detection rates using cap-assisted and Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Joseph Marsano; Sheeva Johnson; Stephanie Yan; Latifat Alli-Akintade; Machelle Wilson; Amar Al-Juburi; Jesse Stondell; Sooraj Tejaswi
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.