Literature DB >> 28614726

Visual sensitivity for luminance and chromatic stimuli during the execution of smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements.

Doris I Braun1, Alexander C Schütz2, Karl R Gegenfurtner3.   

Abstract

Visual sensitivity is dynamically modulated by eye movements. During saccadic eye movements, sensitivity is reduced selectively for low-spatial frequency luminance stimuli and largely unaffected for high-spatial frequency luminance and chromatic stimuli (Nature 371 (1994), 511-513). During smooth pursuit eye movements, sensitivity for low-spatial frequency luminance stimuli is moderately reduced while sensitivity for chromatic and high-spatial frequency luminance stimuli is even increased (Nature Neuroscience, 11 (2008), 1211-1216). Since these effects are at least partly of different polarity, we investigated the combined effects of saccades and smooth pursuit on visual sensitivity. For the time course of chromatic sensitivity, we found that detection rates increased slightly around pursuit onset. During saccades to static and moving targets, detection rates dropped briefly before the saccade and reached a minimum at saccade onset. This reduction of chromatic sensitivity was present whenever a saccade was executed and it was not modified by subsequent pursuit. We also measured contrast sensitivity for flashed high- and low-spatial frequency luminance and chromatic stimuli during saccades and pursuit. During saccades, the reduction of contrast sensitivity was strongest for low-spatial frequency luminance stimuli (about 90%). However, a significant reduction was also present for chromatic stimuli (about 58%). Chromatic sensitivity was increased during smooth pursuit (about 12%). These results suggest that the modulation of visual sensitivity during saccades and smooth pursuit is more complex than previously assumed.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Color; Luminance; Saccade; Saccadic suppression; Smooth pursuit; Visual sensitivity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28614726     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  Eye Position Error Influence over "Open-Loop" Smooth Pursuit Initiation.

Authors:  Antimo Buonocore; Julianne Skinner; Ziad M Hafed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Perception during double-step saccades.

Authors:  E Zimmermann; M C Morrone; P Binda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Recognition efficiency of atypical cardiovascular readings on ECG devices through fogged goggles.

Authors:  Jia-Wei Ren; Jun Yao; Ju Wang; Hao-Yun Jiang; Xue-Cheng Zhao
Journal:  Displays       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.167

4.  Saccade suppression of displacements, but not of contrast, depends on context.

Authors:  Eckart Zimmermann; Joachim Lange
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.004

5.  Intra-saccadic motion streaks as cues to linking object locations across saccades.

Authors:  Richard Schweitzer; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Stronger saccadic suppression of displacement and blanking effect in children.

Authors:  Emma E M Stewart; Carolin Hübner; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Neural correlates of intra-saccadic motion perception.

Authors:  Gaëlle Nicolas; Eric Castet; Adrien Rabier; Emmanuelle Kristensen; Michel Dojat; Anne Guérin-Dugué
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.