Literature DB >> 28613436

The Incremental Cost of Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A National Cohort Analysis.

D Axelrod1, K L Lentine2, M A Schnitzler2, X Luo3, H Xiao2, B J Orandi4, A Massie3, J Garonzik-Wang3, M D Stegall5, S C Jordan6, J Oberholzer7, T B Dunn8, L E Ratner9, S Kapur10, R P Pelletier11, J P Roberts4, M L Melcher12, P Singh13, D L Sudan14, M P Posner15, J M El-Amm16, R Shapiro17, M Cooper18, G S Lipkowitz19, M A Rees20, C L Marsh21, B R Sankari22, D A Gerber23, P W Nelson24, J Wellen25, A Bozorgzadeh26, A Osama Gaber27, R A Montgomery28, D L Segev3.   

Abstract

Incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) has been established as an effective option for end-stage renal disease patients with willing but HLA-incompatible living donors, reducing mortality and improving quality of life. Depending on antibody titer, ILDKT can require highly resource-intensive procedures, including intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and/or cell-depleting antibody treatment, as well as protocol biopsies and donor-specific antibody testing. This study sought to compare the cost and Medicare reimbursement, exclusive of organ acquisition payment, for ILDKT (n = 926) with varying antibody titers to matched compatible transplants (n = 2762) performed between 2002 and 2011. Data were assembled from a national cohort study of ILDKT and a unique data set linking hospital cost accounting data and Medicare claims. ILDKT was more expensive than matched compatible transplantation, ranging from 20% higher adjusted costs for positive on Luminex assay but negative flow cytometric crossmatch, 26% higher for positive flow cytometric crossmatch but negative cytotoxic crossmatch, and 39% higher for positive cytotoxic crossmatch (p < 0.0001 for all). ILDKT was associated with longer median length of stay (12.9 vs. 7.8 days), higher Medicare payments ($91 330 vs. $63 782 p < 0.0001), and greater outlier payments. In conclusion, ILDKT increases the cost of and payments for kidney transplantation.
© 2017 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical research/practice; desensitization; economics; health services and outcomes research; kidney transplantation/nephrology; kidney transplantation: living donor

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28613436     DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  3 in total

1.  KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors.

Authors:  Krista L Lentine; Bertram L Kasiske; Andrew S Levey; Patricia L Adams; Josefina Alberú; Mohamed A Bakr; Lorenzo Gallon; Catherine A Garvey; Sandeep Guleria; Philip Kam-Tao Li; Dorry L Segev; Sandra J Taler; Kazunari Tanabe; Linda Wright; Martin G Zeier; Michael Cheung; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  How do highly sensitized patients get kidney transplants in the United States? Trends over the last decade.

Authors:  Kyle R Jackson; Jennifer D Motter; Amber Kernodle; Niraj Desai; Alvin G Thomas; Allan B Massie; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  KPDGUI: An interactive application for optimization and management of a virtual kidney paired donation program.

Authors:  Mathieu Bray; Wen Wang; Michael A Rees; Peter X-K Song; Alan B Leichtman; Valarie B Ashby; John D Kalbfleisch
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 6.698

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.