Janio Szklaruk1, Diana Kaya1, Wei Wei2. 1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA. 2. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The study aims to evaluate added value of the pelvic portion of the computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination in patients with a primary diagnosis of hepatocellular cancer (HCC). METHODS: The study reviewed the medical records of 478 patients with 881 examinations of the abdomen and pelvis who underwent treatment at our institution between March 2015 and March 2016. These patients were reviewed for presence of pathology in the pelvis, which were classified into two categories as new or old (already known on prior imaging). RESULTS: Of 478 patients, 230 underwent MRI examination of the abdomen and pelvis, and the other 248 underwent CT scans of these regions. There were no findings on the CT or MRI of the pelvis in 80.5% of patients (n = 385), including 81.5% of those who had CT and 79.6% of those who had MRI. Ninety-three patients had findings in the pelvis, the most common of which were bone metastases (31 patients), ascites (27 patients), implants (seven patients), and bladder wall thickening (five patients). In only 7.9% of patients, the findings were related to metastatic disease. In 5.4% of all imaging studies revealed a new finding in the pelvis. CONCLUSION: Imaging of the pelvis (CT or MRI) does not seem to provide additional information in the majority of cases with HCC. The results suggest that the follow-up evaluation of patients with HCC may not include a pelvis exam.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The study aims to evaluate added value of the pelvic portion of the computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination in patients with a primary diagnosis of hepatocellular cancer (HCC). METHODS: The study reviewed the medical records of 478 patients with 881 examinations of the abdomen and pelvis who underwent treatment at our institution between March 2015 and March 2016. These patients were reviewed for presence of pathology in the pelvis, which were classified into two categories as new or old (already known on prior imaging). RESULTS: Of 478 patients, 230 underwent MRI examination of the abdomen and pelvis, and the other 248 underwent CT scans of these regions. There were no findings on the CT or MRI of the pelvis in 80.5% of patients (n = 385), including 81.5% of those who had CT and 79.6% of those who had MRI. Ninety-three patients had findings in the pelvis, the most common of which were bone metastases (31 patients), ascites (27 patients), implants (seven patients), and bladder wall thickening (five patients). In only 7.9% of patients, the findings were related to metastatic disease. In 5.4% of all imaging studies revealed a new finding in the pelvis. CONCLUSION: Imaging of the pelvis (CT or MRI) does not seem to provide additional information in the majority of cases with HCC. The results suggest that the follow-up evaluation of patients with HCC may not include a pelvis exam.