Literature DB >> 28612481

Review: Biological and Molecular Differences between Tail Regeneration and Limb Scarring in Lizard: An Inspiring Model Addressing Limb Regeneration in Amniotes.

Lorenzo Alibardi1.   

Abstract

Tissue regeneration in lizards represents a unique model of regeneration and scarring in amniotes. The tail and limb contain putative stem cells but also dedifferentiating cells contribute to regeneration. Following tail amputation, inflammation is low and cell proliferation high, leading to regeneration while the intense inflammation in the limb leads to low proliferation and scarring. FGFs stimulate tail and limb regeneration and are present in the wound epidermis and blastema while they disappear in the limb wound epidermis 2-3 weeks postamputation in the scarring outgrowth. FGFs localize in the tail blastema and the apical epidermal peg (AEP), an epidermal microregion that allows tail growth but is absent in the limb. Inflammatory cells invade the limb blastema and wound epidermis, impeding the formation of an AEP. An embryonic program of growth is activated in the tail, dominated by Wnt-positive and -negative regulators of cell proliferation and noncoding RNAs, that represent the key regenerative genes. The balanced actions of these regulators likely impede the formation of a tumor in the tail tip. Genes for FACIT and fibrillar collagens, protease inhibitors, and embryonic keratins are upregulated in the regenerating tail blastema. A strong downregulation of genes for both B and T-lymphocyte activation suggests the regenerating tail blastema is a temporal immune-tolerated organ, whereas a scarring program is activated in the limb. Wnt inhibitors, pro-inflammatory genes, negative regulators of cell proliferation, downregulation of myogenic genes, proteases, and oxidases favoring scarring are upregulated. The evolution of an efficient immune system may be the main limiting barrier for organ regeneration in amniotes, and the poor regeneration of mammals and birds is associated with the efficiency of their mature immune system. This does not tolerate embryonic antigens formed in reprogrammed embryonic cells (as for neoplastic cells) that are consequently eliminated impeding the regeneration of lost organs.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28612481     DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.22754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol        ISSN: 1552-5007            Impact factor:   2.656


  4 in total

1.  Gene expression in regenerating and scarring tails of lizard evidences three main key genes (wnt2b, egfl6, and arhgap28) activated during the regulated process of tail regeneration.

Authors:  Massimo Degan; Luisa Dalla Valle; Lorenzo Alibardi
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.356

2.  Immunodetection of ephrin receptors in the regenerating tail of the lizard Podarcis muralis suggests stimulation of differentiation and muscle segmentation.

Authors:  Lorenzo Alibardi
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2019-09-18

3.  Transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of Hemidactylus frenatus during initial stages of tail regeneration.

Authors:  Sai Pawan Nagumantri; Sarena Banu; Mohammed M Idris
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  At What Cost? Trade-Offs and Influences on Energetic Investment in Tail Regeneration in Lizards Following Autotomy.

Authors:  James I Barr; Catherine A Boisvert; Philip W Bateman
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2021-11-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.