Literature DB >> 28612478

High stoma prevalence and stoma reversal complications following anterior resection for rectal cancer: a population-based multicentre study.

K Holmgren1, D Kverneng Hultberg1, M M Haapamäki1, P Matthiessen2, J Rutegård1, M Rutegård1.   

Abstract

AIM: Fashioning a defunctioning stoma is common when performing an anterior resection for rectal cancer in order to avoid and mitigate the consequences of an anastomotic leakage. We investigated the permanent stoma prevalence, factors influencing stoma outcome and complication rates following stoma reversal surgery.
METHOD: Patients who had undergone an anterior resection for rectal cancer between 2007 and 2013 in the northern healthcare region were identified using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and were followed until the end of 2014 regarding stoma outcome. Data were retrieved by a review of medical records. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate predefined risk factors for stoma permanence. Risk factors for non-reversal of a defunctioning stoma were also analysed, using Cox proportional-hazards regression.
RESULTS: A total of 316 patients who underwent anterior resection were included, of whom 274 (87%) were defunctioned primarily. At the end of the follow-up period 24% had a permanent stoma, and 9% of patients who underwent reversal of a stoma experienced major complications requiring a return to theatre, need for intensive care or mortality. Anastomotic leakage and tumour Stage IV were significant risk factors for stoma permanence. In this series, partial mesorectal excision correlated with a stoma-free outcome. Non-reversal was considerably more prevalent among patients with leakage and Stage IV; Stage III patients at first had a decreased reversal rate, which increased after the initial year of surgery.
CONCLUSION: Stoma permanence is common after anterior resection, while anastomotic leakage and advanced tumour stage decrease the chances of a stoma-free outcome. Stoma reversal surgery entails a significant risk of major complications. Colorectal Disease
© 2017 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Defunctioning stoma; diverting stoma; faecal diversion; permanent stoma

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28612478     DOI: 10.1111/codi.13771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  10 in total

1.  Oncological and anorectal functional outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer, particularly the extent of sphincter resection and sphincter saving.

Authors:  Jin Cheon Kim; Jong Lyul Lee; Joon Woo Bong; Ji Hyun Seo; Chan Wook Kim; Seong Ho Park; Jihoon Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparison of postoperative complication rates between a novel endoluminal balloon-assisted drainage and diverting stoma after low rectal cancer.

Authors:  W Liang; H Jie; Z Zeng; S Luo; Z Liu; L Huang; L Kang
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Preoperative biomarkers related to inflammation may identify high-risk anastomoses in colorectal cancer surgery: explorative study.

Authors:  Klas Holmgren; Pär Jonsson; Christina Lundin; Peter Matthiessen; Jörgen Rutegård; Malin Sund; Martin Rutegård
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-05-02

4.  Symptom clusters in patients with colorectal cancer after colostomy: a longitudinal study in Shanghai.

Authors:  Jianling Hao; Liyan Gu; Peng Liu; Lingjuan Zhang; Honglian Xu; Qun Qiu; Wei Zhang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 5.  Endoscopic vacuum therapy for the treatment of colorectal leaks - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Florian Kühn; Josefine Schardey; Ulrich Wirth; Tobias Schiergens; Alexander Crispin; Nicola Beger; Dorian Andrade; Moritz Drefs; Petra Zimmermann; Maria Burian; Joachim Andrassy; Jens Werner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Long-term outcome after chronic anastomotic leakage following surgery for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Florian Ponholzer; Clemens Paul Klingler; Elisabeth Gasser; Philipp Gehwolf; Marijana Ninkovic; Ruben Bellotti; Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch; Dietmar Öfner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Nomogram to predict permanent stoma in rectal cancer patients after sphincter-saving surgery.

Authors:  Chih-Yu Kuo; Po-Li Wei; Chia-Che Chen; Yen-Kuang Lin; Li-Jen Kuo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-08-27

8.  Modified Colon Leakage Score to Predict Anastomotic Leakage in Patients Who Underwent Left-Sided Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Seung Up Yang; Eun Jung Park; Seung Hyuk Baik; Kang Young Lee; Jeonghyun Kang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Long term outcome of anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Alice Artus; Nicolas Tabchouri; Othman Iskander; Nicolas Michot; Olivier Muller; Urs Giger-Pabst; Pascal Bourlier; Céline Bourbao-Tournois; Aurore Kraemer-Bucur; Thierry Lecomte; Ephrem Salamé; Mehdi Ouaissi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Development of a Risk Scoring System for Predicting Anastomotic Leakage Following Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Zhongbo Han; Dawei Chen; Yan Li; Guangshuai Zhou; Meng Wang; Chao Zhang
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.423

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.